From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4D1C4332F for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 23:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229774AbiLPXFa (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2022 18:05:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36774 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229495AbiLPXF0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2022 18:05:26 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C3361D46 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 15:05:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 2BGN25S9002662; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 17:02:06 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 2BGN247J002658; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 17:02:04 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 17:02:03 -0600 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= Cc: Christophe Leroy , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] powerpc/64: Set default CPU in Kconfig Message-ID: <20221216230203.GK25951@gate.crashing.org> References: <3fd60c2d8a28668a42b766b18362a526ef47e757.1670420281.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> <20221215204202.mbw2ij4ou7t2ttpv@pali> <20221216191543.GE25951@gate.crashing.org> <20221216222359.74i6otxszwanf76y@pali> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20221216222359.74i6otxszwanf76y@pali> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 11:23:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > It appears the E500MC64 never made it outside of FSL, so it is best not > > to use it at all, imo. > > Yes, it really makes sense to not use e500mc64 flag. Maybe gcc > documentation could be updated to mention this fact? Thanks. I filed so that we don't forget about this. Segher