From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: "Phil Auld" <pauld@redhat.com>,
"Wenjie Li" <wenjieli@qti.qualcomm.com>,
"David Wang 王标" <wangbiao3@xiaomi.com>,
"Quentin Perret" <qperret@google.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] sched: Use kfree_rcu() in do_set_cpus_allowed()
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 17:49:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221222224937.21028-3-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221222224937.21028-1-longman@redhat.com>
Commit 851a723e45d1 ("sched: Always clear user_cpus_ptr in
do_set_cpus_allowed()") may call kfree() if user_cpus_ptr was previously
set. Unfortunately, some of the callers of do_set_cpus_allowed()
may have pi_lock held when calling it. So the following splats may be
printed especially when running with a PREEMPT_RT kernel:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context
To avoid these problems, kfree_rcu() is used instead. An internal
cpumask_rcuhead union is created for the sole purpose of facilitating
the use of kfree_rcu() to free the cpumask.
Fixes: 851a723e45d1 ("sched: Always clear user_cpus_ptr in do_set_cpus_allowed()")
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index b93d030b9fd5..c2df236fd8c1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2604,9 +2604,19 @@ void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask)
.user_mask = NULL,
.flags = SCA_USER, /* clear the user requested mask */
};
+ union cpumask_rcuhead {
+ cpumask_t cpumask;
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
+ };
__do_set_cpus_allowed(p, &ac);
- kfree(ac.user_mask);
+
+ /*
+ * Because this is called with p->pi_lock held, it is not possible
+ * to use kfree() here (when PREEMPT_RT=y), therefore punt to using
+ * kfree_rcu().
+ */
+ kfree_rcu((union cpumask_rcuhead *)ac.user_mask, rcu);
}
int dup_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src,
@@ -2614,6 +2624,7 @@ int dup_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src,
{
cpumask_t *user_mask;
unsigned long flags;
+ int size;
/*
* Always clear dst->user_cpus_ptr first as their user_cpus_ptr's
@@ -2629,7 +2640,11 @@ int dup_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src,
if (data_race(!src->user_cpus_ptr))
return 0;
- user_mask = kmalloc_node(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL, node);
+ /*
+ * See do_set_cpus_allowed() for the rcu_head usage.
+ */
+ size = max_t(int, cpumask_size(), sizeof(struct rcu_head));
+ user_mask = kmalloc_node(size, GFP_KERNEL, node);
if (!user_mask)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -8230,7 +8245,7 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
struct affinity_context ac;
struct cpumask *user_mask;
struct task_struct *p;
- int retval;
+ int retval, size;
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -8263,7 +8278,11 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
if (retval)
goto out_put_task;
- user_mask = kmalloc(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
+ /*
+ * See do_set_cpus_allowed() for the rcu_head usage.
+ */
+ size = max_t(int, cpumask_size(), sizeof(struct rcu_head));
+ user_mask = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!user_mask) {
retval = -ENOMEM;
goto out_put_task;
--
2.31.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-22 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-22 22:49 [PATCH v4 0/2] sched: Fix dup_user_cpus_ptr() & do_set_cpus_allowed() bugs Waiman Long
2022-12-22 22:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] sched: Fix use-after-free bug in dup_user_cpus_ptr() Waiman Long
2022-12-22 22:49 ` Waiman Long [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221222224937.21028-3-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wangbiao3@xiaomi.com \
--cc=wenjieli@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox