public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: "Phil Auld" <pauld@redhat.com>,
	"Wenjie Li" <wenjieli@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	"David Wang 王标" <wangbiao3@xiaomi.com>,
	"Quentin Perret" <qperret@google.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] sched: Use kfree_rcu() in do_set_cpus_allowed()
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 17:49:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221222224937.21028-3-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221222224937.21028-1-longman@redhat.com>

Commit 851a723e45d1 ("sched: Always clear user_cpus_ptr in
do_set_cpus_allowed()") may call kfree() if user_cpus_ptr was previously
set. Unfortunately, some of the callers of do_set_cpus_allowed()
may have pi_lock held when calling it. So the following splats may be
printed especially when running with a PREEMPT_RT kernel:

   WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
   BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context

To avoid these problems, kfree_rcu() is used instead. An internal
cpumask_rcuhead union is created for the sole purpose of facilitating
the use of kfree_rcu() to free the cpumask.

Fixes: 851a723e45d1 ("sched: Always clear user_cpus_ptr in do_set_cpus_allowed()")
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index b93d030b9fd5..c2df236fd8c1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2604,9 +2604,19 @@ void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask)
 		.user_mask = NULL,
 		.flags     = SCA_USER,	/* clear the user requested mask */
 	};
+	union cpumask_rcuhead {
+		cpumask_t cpumask;
+		struct rcu_head rcu;
+	};
 
 	__do_set_cpus_allowed(p, &ac);
-	kfree(ac.user_mask);
+
+	/*
+	 * Because this is called with p->pi_lock held, it is not possible
+	 * to use kfree() here (when PREEMPT_RT=y), therefore punt to using
+	 * kfree_rcu().
+	 */
+	kfree_rcu((union cpumask_rcuhead *)ac.user_mask, rcu);
 }
 
 int dup_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src,
@@ -2614,6 +2624,7 @@ int dup_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src,
 {
 	cpumask_t *user_mask;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	int size;
 
 	/*
 	 * Always clear dst->user_cpus_ptr first as their user_cpus_ptr's
@@ -2629,7 +2640,11 @@ int dup_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src,
 	if (data_race(!src->user_cpus_ptr))
 		return 0;
 
-	user_mask = kmalloc_node(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL, node);
+	/*
+	 * See do_set_cpus_allowed() for the rcu_head usage.
+	 */
+	size = max_t(int, cpumask_size(), sizeof(struct rcu_head));
+	user_mask = kmalloc_node(size, GFP_KERNEL, node);
 	if (!user_mask)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -8230,7 +8245,7 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
 	struct affinity_context ac;
 	struct cpumask *user_mask;
 	struct task_struct *p;
-	int retval;
+	int retval, size;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
@@ -8263,7 +8278,11 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
 	if (retval)
 		goto out_put_task;
 
-	user_mask = kmalloc(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
+	/*
+	 * See do_set_cpus_allowed() for the rcu_head usage.
+	 */
+	size = max_t(int, cpumask_size(), sizeof(struct rcu_head));
+	user_mask = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!user_mask) {
 		retval = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out_put_task;
-- 
2.31.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-22 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-22 22:49 [PATCH v4 0/2] sched: Fix dup_user_cpus_ptr() & do_set_cpus_allowed() bugs Waiman Long
2022-12-22 22:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] sched: Fix use-after-free bug in dup_user_cpus_ptr() Waiman Long
2022-12-22 22:49 ` Waiman Long [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221222224937.21028-3-longman@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangbiao3@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=wenjieli@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox