Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/63] 5.10.162-rc1 review

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-05T11:43:44Z

On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 04:56:31PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
>
> > On Jan 4, 2023, at 12:29 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > ﻿On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 04:16:07PM +0000, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:13:30AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.162 release.
> >>> There are 63 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >>> let me know.
> >>>
> >>> Responses should be made by Thu, 05 Jan 2023 08:12:47 +0000.
> >>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>>
> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.162-rc1.gz
> >>> or in the git tree and branch at:
> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> >>> and the diffstat can be found below.
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>
> >> Testing fails. Could you please pick these 2 up?
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221230153215.1333921-1-joel@joelfernandes.org
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221230153215.1333921-2-joel@joelfernandes.org/
> >
> > That is not a regression from 5.10.161, right?
>
> Yes it is not.
>
> > This release is only for
> > the io_uring stuff to make sure that backport was done correctly.
> >
> > The current "to apply" queue for the stable trees is very large right
> > now due to everyone waiting to get tiny things into -rc1 instead of
> > before then, so the above two are still not yet queued up, sorry.
>
> Sure not a problem, I can resend again later if it is still not queued.

You should have already received the email notices saying they were
queued :)