public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	yhs@fb.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: skip invalid kfunc call in backtrack_insn
Date: Wed,  4 Jan 2023 09:47:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230104014709.9375-1-sunhao.th@gmail.com> (raw)

The verifier skips invalid kfunc call in check_kfunc_call(), which
would be captured in fixup_kfunc_call() if such insn is not
eliminated by dead code elimination. However, this can lead to the
following warning in backtrack_insn(), alse see [1]:

------------[ cut here ]------------
verifier backtracking bug
WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 8646 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2756 backtrack_insn
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2756
	__mark_chain_precision kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3065
	mark_chain_precision kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3165
	adjust_reg_min_max_vals kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10715
	check_alu_op kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10928
	do_check kernel/bpf/verifier.c:13821 [inline]
	do_check_common kernel/bpf/verifier.c:16289
...

So make backtracking conservative with this by returning ENOTSUPP.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsaXNceR8ZjkLG=dT3P=4A8SBsg0Z5h5PWLryF5=ghKq=g@mail.gmail.com/

Signed-off-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 4a25375ebb0d..04887b1e4178 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2750,6 +2750,12 @@ static int backtrack_insn(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx,
 			 */
 			if (insn->src_reg == 0 && is_callback_calling_function(insn->imm))
 				return -ENOTSUPP;
+			/* kfunc with imm==0 is invalid and fixup_kfunc_call will
+			 * catch this error later. Make backtracking conservative
+			 * with ENOTSUPP.
+			 */
+			if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL && insn->imm == 0)
+				return -ENOTSUPP;
 			/* regular helper call sets R0 */
 			*reg_mask &= ~1;
 			if (*reg_mask & 0x3f) {

base-commit: acd3b7768048fe338248cdf43ccfbf8c084a6bc1
-- 
2.39.0


             reply	other threads:[~2023-01-04  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-04  1:47 Hao Sun [this message]
2023-01-04 16:55 ` [PATCH] bpf: skip invalid kfunc call in backtrack_insn Yonghong Song
2023-01-06 18:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230104014709.9375-1-sunhao.th@gmail.com \
    --to=sunhao.th@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox