From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] tools/nolibc: Fix S_ISxxx macros
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 10:18:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230106171834.41532-1-imp@bsdimp.com> (raw)
The mode field has the type encoded as an value in a field, not as a bit
mask. Mask the mode with S_IFMT instead of each type to test. Otherwise,
false positives are possible: eg S_ISDIR will return true for block
devices because S_IFDIR = 0040000 and S_IFBLK = 0060000 since mode is
masked with S_IFDIR instead of S_IFMT. These macros now match the
similar definitions in tools/include/uapi/linux/stat.h.
Signed-off-by: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
---
tools/include/nolibc/types.h | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/types.h b/tools/include/nolibc/types.h
index 959997034e55..7770328dcef7 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/types.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/types.h
@@ -26,13 +26,13 @@
#define S_IFSOCK 0140000
#define S_IFMT 0170000
-#define S_ISDIR(mode) (((mode) & S_IFDIR) == S_IFDIR)
-#define S_ISCHR(mode) (((mode) & S_IFCHR) == S_IFCHR)
-#define S_ISBLK(mode) (((mode) & S_IFBLK) == S_IFBLK)
-#define S_ISREG(mode) (((mode) & S_IFREG) == S_IFREG)
-#define S_ISFIFO(mode) (((mode) & S_IFIFO) == S_IFIFO)
-#define S_ISLNK(mode) (((mode) & S_IFLNK) == S_IFLNK)
-#define S_ISSOCK(mode) (((mode) & S_IFSOCK) == S_IFSOCK)
+#define S_ISDIR(mode) (((mode) & S_IFMT) == S_IFDIR)
+#define S_ISCHR(mode) (((mode) & S_IFMT) == S_IFCHR)
+#define S_ISBLK(mode) (((mode) & S_IFMT) == S_IFBLK)
+#define S_ISREG(mode) (((mode) & S_IFMT) == S_IFREG)
+#define S_ISFIFO(mode) (((mode) & S_IFMT) == S_IFIFO)
+#define S_ISLNK(mode) (((mode) & S_IFMT) == S_IFLNK)
+#define S_ISSOCK(mode) (((mode) & S_IFMT) == S_IFSOCK)
/* dirent types */
#define DT_UNKNOWN 0x0
--
2.33.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-01-06 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-06 17:18 Warner Losh [this message]
2023-01-08 9:34 ` [PATCH v2] tools/nolibc: Fix S_ISxxx macros Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230106171834.41532-1-imp@bsdimp.com \
--to=imp@bsdimp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox