From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] iommu/vt-d: Remove sva from intel_svm_dev
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 09:49:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230109014955.147068-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230109014955.147068-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
After commit be51b1d6bbff ("iommu/sva: Refactoring
iommu_sva_bind/unbind_device()"), the iommu driver doesn't need to
return an iommu_sva pointer anymore. This removes the sva field
from intel_svm_dev and cleanups the code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 1 -
drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
index 2a1619ff0d79..f0222ad38757 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
@@ -761,7 +761,6 @@ struct intel_svm_dev {
struct rcu_head rcu;
struct device *dev;
struct intel_iommu *iommu;
- struct iommu_sva sva;
u16 did;
u16 sid, qdep;
};
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index c7dc53e40c26..e7b9bedebcc0 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -298,9 +298,8 @@ static int pasid_to_svm_sdev(struct device *dev, unsigned int pasid,
return 0;
}
-static struct iommu_sva *intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
- struct device *dev,
- struct mm_struct *mm)
+static int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev,
+ struct mm_struct *mm)
{
struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
struct intel_svm_dev *sdev;
@@ -312,7 +311,7 @@ static struct iommu_sva *intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
if (!svm) {
svm = kzalloc(sizeof(*svm), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!svm)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ return -ENOMEM;
svm->pasid = mm->pasid;
svm->mm = mm;
@@ -322,14 +321,14 @@ static struct iommu_sva *intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
ret = mmu_notifier_register(&svm->notifier, mm);
if (ret) {
kfree(svm);
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ return ret;
}
ret = pasid_private_add(svm->pasid, svm);
if (ret) {
mmu_notifier_unregister(&svm->notifier, mm);
kfree(svm);
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ return ret;
}
}
@@ -343,7 +342,6 @@ static struct iommu_sva *intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
sdev->iommu = iommu;
sdev->did = FLPT_DEFAULT_DID;
sdev->sid = PCI_DEVID(info->bus, info->devfn);
- sdev->sva.dev = dev;
init_rcu_head(&sdev->rcu);
if (info->ats_enabled) {
sdev->qdep = info->ats_qdep;
@@ -360,7 +358,7 @@ static struct iommu_sva *intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
list_add_rcu(&sdev->list, &svm->devs);
- return &sdev->sva;
+ return 0;
free_sdev:
kfree(sdev);
@@ -371,7 +369,7 @@ static struct iommu_sva *intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
kfree(svm);
}
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ return ret;
}
/* Caller must hold pasid_mutex */
@@ -843,13 +841,10 @@ static int intel_svm_set_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
struct mm_struct *mm = domain->mm;
- struct iommu_sva *sva;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
mutex_lock(&pasid_mutex);
- sva = intel_svm_bind_mm(iommu, dev, mm);
- if (IS_ERR(sva))
- ret = PTR_ERR(sva);
+ ret = intel_svm_bind_mm(iommu, dev, mm);
mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex);
return ret;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-09 1:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-09 1:49 [PATCH 0/4] iommu/vt-d: SVM implementation cleanup Lu Baolu
2023-01-09 1:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] iommu/vt-d: Remove include/linux/intel-svm.h Lu Baolu
2023-01-09 1:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] iommu/vt-d: Remove unused fields in svm structures Lu Baolu
2023-01-09 1:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/vt-d: Remove users from intel_svm_dev Lu Baolu
2023-01-09 1:49 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2023-01-10 2:46 ` [PATCH 0/4] iommu/vt-d: SVM implementation cleanup Tian, Kevin
2023-01-31 7:51 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230109014955.147068-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox