From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDC6C54EBE for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 09:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231970AbjAJJ0F (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2023 04:26:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39480 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238173AbjAJJZ1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2023 04:25:27 -0500 Received: from 1wt.eu (wtarreau.pck.nerim.net [62.212.114.60]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BF8551EE for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 01:25:25 -0800 (PST) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 30A9PHD1004644; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:25:17 +0100 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:25:17 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sven Schnelle Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] nolibc: add support for the s390 platform Message-ID: <20230110092517.GA4626@1wt.eu> References: <20230109080910.26594-1-w@1wt.eu> <20230109191534.GU4028633@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20230110073242.GB3229@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230110073242.GB3229@1wt.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 08:32:42AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:15:34AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:09:06AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > Hello Paul, > > > > > > this series adds support for the s390x platform to nolibc and rcutorture, > > > reducing the init size from ~600kB to ~1kB. The work was contributed by > > > Sven Schnelle. It depends on the fixes series I sent previously: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230109075442.25963-1-w@1wt.eu/ > > > > > > It passes the self-tests correctly and the patches are clean, please > > > consider queuing it. > > > > "80 test(s) passed" and successful exit code. I will assume that the > > decrease in tests from 81 to 80 is intended. I have these queued, > > but it may be some hours before they are externally visible. > > Interesting, I didn't notice and I'm not observing this when running > qemu-s390x (the userland version), I'm currently rebuilding the kernel > to compare and will let you know. Thanks for checking! So after a re-check, I'm constantly seeing 82 tests passed and a success here. I don't understand what's differing, and would be interested in a copy of your "run.out" in the "tools/testing/selftests/nolibc" subdir to compare with mine, as it's possible we have a bug somewhere in the way tests are run (or maybe we're still facing a mangled qemu output). You can just send this to me privately, no need to spam the list, the file is moderately large and uninteresting. Thanks! Willy