From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 07/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Add bad address test
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 21:26:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230110202632.2533978-8-scgl@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230110202632.2533978-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Add test that tries to access, instead of CHECK_ONLY.
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
index 77cac3e502ec..5d5096fad161 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
@@ -965,7 +965,9 @@ static void _test_errors_common(struct test_info info, enum mop_target target, i
/* Bad guest address: */
rv = ERR_MOP(info, target, WRITE, mem1, size, GADDR((void *)~0xfffUL), CHECK_ONLY);
- TEST_ASSERT(rv > 0, "ioctl does not report bad guest memory access");
+ TEST_ASSERT(rv > 0, "ioctl does not report bad guest memory address");
+ rv = ERR_MOP(info, target, WRITE, mem1, size, GADDR((void *)~0xfffUL));
+ TEST_ASSERT(rv > 0, "ioctl does not report bad guest memory address");
/* Bad host address: */
rv = ERR_MOP(info, target, WRITE, 0, size, GADDR_V(mem1));
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-10 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-10 20:26 [PATCH v5 00/10] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key checked cmpxchg Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] " Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-11 7:59 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-11 10:00 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-11 10:21 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-11 9:35 ` Janosch Frank
2023-01-11 15:19 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-11 17:26 ` Janosch Frank
2023-01-12 12:48 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-11 9:38 ` Janosch Frank
2023-01-11 15:29 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] Documentation: KVM: s390: Describe KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CMPXCHG Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Pass mop_desc via pointer Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Replace macros by functions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Move testlist into main Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Add cmpxchg tests Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix typo Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix wrong address being used in test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix integer literal Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key checked cmpxchg Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230110202632.2533978-8-scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--to=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox