From: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/task: Add the put_task_struct_atomic_safe function
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 12:02:39 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230120150246.20797-2-wander@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230120150246.20797-1-wander@redhat.com>
With PREEMPT_RT, it is unsafe to call put_task_struct() in atomic
contexts because it indirectly acquires sleeping locks.
Introduce put_task_struct_atomic_safe(), which schedules
__put_task_struct() through call_rcu() when the kernel is compiled with
PREEMPT_RT.
A more natural approach would use a workqueue, but since
in PREEMPT_RT we can't allocate dynamic memory from atomic context,
the code would become more complex because we would need to put the
work_struct instance in the task_struct and initialize it when we
allocate a new task_struct.
Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
include/linux/sched/task.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/fork.c | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/task.h b/include/linux/sched/task.h
index 357e0068497c..80b4c5812563 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/task.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/task.h
@@ -127,6 +127,27 @@ static inline void put_task_struct_many(struct task_struct *t, int nr)
void put_task_struct_rcu_user(struct task_struct *task);
+extern void __delayed_put_task_struct(struct rcu_head *rhp);
+
+static inline void put_task_struct_atomic_safe(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) {
+ /*
+ * Decrement the refcount explicitly to avoid unnecessarily
+ * calling call_rcu.
+ */
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&task->usage))
+ /*
+ * under PREEMPT_RT, we can't call put_task_struct
+ * in atomic context because it will indirectly
+ * acquire sleeping locks.
+ */
+ call_rcu(&task->rcu, __delayed_put_task_struct);
+ } else {
+ put_task_struct(task);
+ }
+}
+
/* Free all architecture-specific resources held by a thread. */
void release_thread(struct task_struct *dead_task);
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 9f7fe3541897..3d7a4e9311b3 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -859,6 +859,14 @@ void __put_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__put_task_struct);
+void __delayed_put_task_struct(struct rcu_head *rhp)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task = container_of(rhp, struct task_struct, rcu);
+
+ __put_task_struct(task);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__delayed_put_task_struct);
+
void __init __weak arch_task_cache_init(void) { }
/*
--
2.39.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-20 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-20 15:02 [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix put_task_struct() calls under PREEMPT_RT Wander Lairson Costa
2023-01-20 15:02 ` Wander Lairson Costa [this message]
2023-01-23 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/task: Add the put_task_struct_atomic_safe function Oleg Nesterov
2023-01-23 16:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-01-23 17:24 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2023-01-27 15:55 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-01-30 11:49 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2023-01-30 14:46 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-01-30 14:58 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2023-01-30 15:20 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-02-17 17:35 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-02-17 19:04 ` luca abeni
2023-02-22 18:42 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2023-02-22 21:00 ` luca abeni
2023-02-24 8:46 ` luca abeni
2023-02-24 13:02 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2023-02-24 16:01 ` luca abeni
2023-01-20 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sched/deadline: fix inactive_task_timer splat Wander Lairson Costa
2023-01-20 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] sched/rt: use put_task_struct_atomic_safe() to avoid potential splat Wander Lairson Costa
2023-01-25 0:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-01-20 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sched/core: " Wander Lairson Costa
2023-01-20 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix put_task_struct() calls under PREEMPT_RT Valentin Schneider
2023-01-20 20:14 ` Wander Lairson Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230120150246.20797-2-wander@redhat.com \
--to=wander@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@gmail.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shorne@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox