From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] driver core: platform: simplify __platform_driver_probe()
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 09:24:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230131082459.301603-2-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230131082459.301603-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
__platform_driver_probe() pokes around in some bus and driver private
lists and locks in a way that is not needed at all. The code only wants
to know if a device was bound to the driver that was registered, so walk
all devices on the bus to see if there was a match. If there is not a
match, return an error. This is the same logic as was originally
present, but just done in a simpler and more obvious way that is not a
layering violation.
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/base/platform.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
index 423874269f9d..77510e4f47de 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -883,6 +883,13 @@ static int platform_probe_fail(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENXIO;
}
+static int is_bound_to_driver(struct device *dev, void *driver)
+{
+ if (dev->driver == driver)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* __platform_driver_probe - register driver for non-hotpluggable device
* @drv: platform driver structure
@@ -936,20 +943,17 @@ int __init_or_module __platform_driver_probe(struct platform_driver *drv,
if (retval)
return retval;
- /*
- * Fixup that section violation, being paranoid about code scanning
- * the list of drivers in order to probe new devices. Check to see
- * if the probe was successful, and make sure any forced probes of
- * new devices fail.
- */
- spin_lock(&drv->driver.bus->p->klist_drivers.k_lock);
+ /* Force all new probes of this driver to fail */
drv->probe = platform_probe_fail;
- if (list_empty(&drv->driver.p->klist_devices.k_list))
- retval = -ENODEV;
- spin_unlock(&drv->driver.bus->p->klist_drivers.k_lock);
- if (retval)
+ /* Walk all platform devices and see if any actually bound to this driver.
+ * If not, return an error as the device should have done so by now.
+ */
+ if (!bus_for_each_dev(&platform_bus_type, NULL, &drv->driver, is_bound_to_driver)) {
+ retval = -ENODEV;
platform_driver_unregister(drv);
+ }
+
return retval;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__platform_driver_probe);
--
2.39.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-31 8:24 [PATCH 1/2] driver core: platform: removed unneeded variable from __platform_driver_probe() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-31 8:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230131082459.301603-2-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox