* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review
2023-02-03 10:13 [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-02-03 20:03 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-02-04 0:53 ` Shuah Khan
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-02-03 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On 2/3/23 02:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.92 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.92-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review
2023-02-03 10:13 [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-03 20:03 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-02-04 0:53 ` Shuah Khan
2023-02-04 1:50 ` Guenter Roeck
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-02-04 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Shuah Khan
On 2/3/23 03:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.92 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.92-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review
2023-02-03 10:13 [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-03 20:03 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-02-04 0:53 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-02-04 1:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-04 2:03 ` Bagas Sanjaya
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-02-04 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:13:27AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.92 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 492 pass: 492 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review
2023-02-03 10:13 [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-04 1:50 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-02-04 2:03 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-02-04 8:31 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2023-02-04 2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 538 bytes --]
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:13:27AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.92 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.2.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review
2023-02-03 10:13 [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-04 2:03 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2023-02-04 8:31 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-02-04 8:55 ` Ron Economos
2023-02-06 8:56 ` Jon Hunter
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-02-04 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, Kyle Huey, Will Deacon
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 at 15:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.92 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.92-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
NOTE:
Following two commits causing build warnings with gcc-12 on arm64 and i386
while building tools/testing/selftests.
selftests/vm: remove ARRAY_SIZE define from individual tests
commit e89908201e2509354c40158b517945bf3d645812 upstream.
tools: fix ARRAY_SIZE defines in tools and selftests hdrs
commit 066b34aa5461f6072dbbecb690f4fe446b736ebf upstream.
## Build
* kernel: 5.15.92-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: c8466dc0f6290e0ea087f808e9b4a29da36e82ca
* git describe: v5.15.91-21-gc8466dc0f629
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.91-21-gc8466dc0f629
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.90-205-g5605d15db022)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.90-205-g5605d15db022)
* arm64, build
- gcc-12-lkftconfig-kselftest-warnings
Build warnings:
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp:
vec-syscfg.c:24: warning: "ARRAY_SIZE" redefined
24 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(a) (sizeof(a) / sizeof(a[0]))
|
In file included from vec-syscfg.c:21:
../../kselftest.h:52: note: this is the location of the previous definition
52 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]))
|
vec-syscfg.c: In function 'get_child_rdvl':
vec-syscfg.c:112:33: warning: too many arguments for format
[-Wformat-extra-args]
112 | fprintf(stderr, "execl(%s) failed: %d\n",
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vec-syscfg.c: At top level:
vec-syscfg.c:326:13: warning: 'prctl_set_same' defined but not
used [-Wunused-function]
326 | static void prctl_set_same(struct vec_data *data)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vec-syscfg.c: In function 'file_write_integer':
vec-syscfg.c:195:12: warning: 'ret' may be used uninitialized
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
195 | if (ret < 0) {
| ^
vec-syscfg.c:183:13: note: 'ret' was declared here
183 | int ret;
| ^~~
* i386, build
- gcc-12-lkftconfig-kselftest-warnings
Build warnings:
tools/testing/selftests/vm
virtual_address_range.c:43:31: warning: left shift count >= width
of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
virtual_address_range.c:88:34: warning: left shift count >= width
of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
virtual_address_range.c:22:26: warning: conversion from 'long long
unsigned int' to 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} changes value from
'17179869184' to '0' [-Woverflow]
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.90-205-g5605d15db022)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.90-205-g5605d15db022)
## Test result summary
total: 162736, pass: 133853, fail: 4290, skip: 24262, xfail: 331
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 149 total, 148 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 49 total, 47 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 39 total, 35 passed, 4 failed
* mips: 31 total, 29 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 32 passed, 2 failed
* riscv: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 16 total, 14 passed, 2 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 42 total, 40 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-comman[
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review
2023-02-03 10:13 [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-04 8:31 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-02-04 8:55 ` Ron Economos
2023-02-06 7:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-06 8:56 ` Jon Hunter
6 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2023-02-04 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On 2/3/23 2:13 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.92 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.92-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review
2023-02-04 8:55 ` Ron Economos
@ 2023-02-06 7:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-02-06 7:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ron Economos
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 12:55:36AM -0800, Ron Economos wrote:
> On 2/3/23 2:13 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.92 release.
> > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.92-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
>
> Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
>
Thanks for testing and letting me know,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review
2023-02-03 10:13 [PATCH 5.15 00/20] 5.15.92-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-04 8:55 ` Ron Economos
@ 2023-02-06 8:56 ` Jon Hunter
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2023-02-06 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, linux-tegra
On Fri, 03 Feb 2023 11:13:27 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.92 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.92-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.15:
11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
114 tests: 114 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.15.92-rc1-gd8296a906e7a
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread