From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 08/14] KVM: s390: Move common code of mem_op functions into function
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 17:45:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230206164602.138068-9-scgl@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230206164602.138068-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
The vcpu and vm mem_op ioctl implementations share some functionality.
Move argument checking into a function and call it from both
implementations. This allows code reuse in case of additional future
mem_op operations.
Suggested-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index e4890e04b210..0367c1a7e69a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -2764,24 +2764,32 @@ static int kvm_s390_handle_pv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_pv_cmd *cmd)
return r;
}
-static bool access_key_invalid(u8 access_key)
+static int mem_op_validate_common(struct kvm_s390_mem_op *mop, u64 supported_flags)
{
- return access_key > 0xf;
+ if (mop->flags & ~supported_flags || !mop->size)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (mop->size > MEM_OP_MAX_SIZE)
+ return -E2BIG;
+ if (mop->flags & KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION) {
+ if (mop->key > 0xf)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else {
+ mop->key = 0;
+ }
+ return 0;
}
static int kvm_s390_vm_mem_op(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_mem_op *mop)
{
void __user *uaddr = (void __user *)mop->buf;
- u64 supported_flags;
void *tmpbuf = NULL;
int r, srcu_idx;
- supported_flags = KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION
- | KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY;
- if (mop->flags & ~supported_flags || !mop->size)
- return -EINVAL;
- if (mop->size > MEM_OP_MAX_SIZE)
- return -E2BIG;
+ r = mem_op_validate_common(mop, KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION |
+ KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY);
+ if (r)
+ return r;
+
/*
* This is technically a heuristic only, if the kvm->lock is not
* taken, it is not guaranteed that the vm is/remains non-protected.
@@ -2793,12 +2801,6 @@ static int kvm_s390_vm_mem_op(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_mem_op *mop)
*/
if (kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(kvm))
return -EINVAL;
- if (mop->flags & KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION) {
- if (access_key_invalid(mop->key))
- return -EINVAL;
- } else {
- mop->key = 0;
- }
if (!(mop->flags & KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY)) {
tmpbuf = vmalloc(mop->size);
if (!tmpbuf)
@@ -5250,23 +5252,17 @@ static long kvm_s390_vcpu_mem_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
{
void __user *uaddr = (void __user *)mop->buf;
void *tmpbuf = NULL;
- int r = 0;
- const u64 supported_flags = KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_INJECT_EXCEPTION
- | KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY
- | KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION;
+ int r;
- if (mop->flags & ~supported_flags || mop->ar >= NUM_ACRS || !mop->size)
+ r = mem_op_validate_common(mop, KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_INJECT_EXCEPTION |
+ KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY |
+ KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION);
+ if (r)
+ return r;
+ if (mop->ar >= NUM_ACRS)
return -EINVAL;
- if (mop->size > MEM_OP_MAX_SIZE)
- return -E2BIG;
if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu))
return -EINVAL;
- if (mop->flags & KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION) {
- if (access_key_invalid(mop->key))
- return -EINVAL;
- } else {
- mop->key = 0;
- }
if (!(mop->flags & KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY)) {
tmpbuf = vmalloc(mop->size);
if (!tmpbuf)
--
2.37.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-06 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-06 16:45 [PATCH v7 00/14] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key checked cmpxchg Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v7 01/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Pass mop_desc via pointer Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v7 02/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Replace macros by functions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v7 03/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Move testlist into main Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v7 04/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Add bad address test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 13:00 ` Janosch Frank
2023-02-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v7 05/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix typo Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v7 06/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix wrong address being used in test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v7 07/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix integer literal Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-06 16:45 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2023-02-07 13:03 ` [PATCH v7 08/14] KVM: s390: Move common code of mem_op functions into function Janosch Frank
2023-02-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v7 09/14] KVM: s390: Dispatch to implementing function at top level of vm mem_op Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 13:08 ` Janosch Frank
2023-02-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v7 10/14] KVM: s390: Refactor absolute vm mem_op function Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 13:17 ` Janosch Frank
2023-02-07 13:22 ` Janosch Frank
2023-02-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v7 11/14] KVM: s390: Refactor vcpu " Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-06 16:46 ` [PATCH v7 12/14] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key checked cmpxchg Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 15:46 ` Janosch Frank
2023-02-06 16:46 ` [PATCH v7 13/14] Documentation: KVM: s390: Describe KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CMPXCHG Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 15:55 ` Janosch Frank
2023-02-06 16:46 ` [PATCH v7 14/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Add cmpxchg tests Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 16:01 ` Janosch Frank
2023-02-07 16:18 ` Janosch Frank
2023-02-07 16:42 ` [PATCH v8 " Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230206164602.138068-9-scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--to=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox