From: Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: x86: Do not unload MMU roots when only toggling CR0.WP
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:36:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230207153651.000067f8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230201194604.11135-4-minipli@grsecurity.net>
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 20:46:01 +0100
Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net> wrote:
> There is no need to unload the MMU roots for a direct MMU role when only
> CR0.WP has changed -- the paging structures are still valid, only the
> permission bitmap needs to be updated.
>
> One heavy user of toggling CR0.WP is grsecurity's KERNEXEC feature to
> implement kernel W^X.
>
Wouldn't it be better to factor out update_permission_bitmask and
update_pkru_bitmask in a common function and call it from here? So that
we can also skip: bunches of if..else..., recalculation of the rsvd mask
and shadow_zero_bit masks.
I suppose this is a critical path according to the patch comments and
kvm_init_mmu() is a non-critical path. Is it better to seperate
them now for saving the maintanence efforts in future? E.g. something heavier
might be introduced into the kvm_init_mmu() path and slows down this path.
> The optimization brings a huge performance gain for this case as the
> following micro-benchmark running 'ssdd 10 50000' from rt-tests[1] on a
> grsecurity L1 VM shows (runtime in seconds, lower is better):
>
> legacy TDP shadow
> kvm.git/queue 11.55s 13.91s 75.2s
> kvm.git/queue+patch 7.32s 7.31s 74.6s
>
> For legacy MMU this is ~36% faster, for TTP MMU even ~47% faster. Also
> TDP and legacy MMU now both have around the same runtime which vanishes
> the need to disable TDP MMU for grsecurity.
>
> Shadow MMU sees no measurable difference and is still slow, as expected.
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/rt-tests/rt-tests.git
>
> Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
> ---
> v2: handle the CR0.WP case directly in kvm_post_set_cr0() and only for
> the direct MMU role -- Sean
>
> I re-ran the benchmark and it's even faster than with my patch, as the
> critical path is now the first one handled and is now inline. Thanks a
> lot for the suggestion, Sean!
>
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 508074e47bc0..f09bfc0a3cc1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -902,6 +902,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(load_pdptrs);
>
> void kvm_post_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long old_cr0, unsigned long cr0)
> {
> + /*
> + * Toggling just CR0.WP doesn't invalidate page tables per se, only the
> + * permission bits.
> + */
> + if (vcpu->arch.mmu->root_role.direct && (cr0 ^ old_cr0) == X86_CR0_WP) {
> + kvm_init_mmu(vcpu);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if ((cr0 ^ old_cr0) & X86_CR0_PG) {
> kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue(vcpu);
> kvm_async_pf_hash_reset(vcpu);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-07 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-01 19:45 [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: MMU: performance tweaks for heavy CR0.WP users Mathias Krause
2023-02-01 19:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Avoid indirect call for get_cr3 Mathias Krause
2023-02-01 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: VMX: Avoid retpoline call for control register caused exits Mathias Krause
2023-03-15 21:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-20 20:43 ` Mathias Krause
2023-02-01 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: x86: Do not unload MMU roots when only toggling CR0.WP Mathias Krause
2023-02-07 13:36 ` Zhi Wang [this message]
2023-02-08 9:52 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-15 21:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-15 22:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-20 21:13 ` Mathias Krause
2023-02-01 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: x86: Make use of kvm_read_cr*_bits() when testing bits Mathias Krause
2023-02-07 13:05 ` Zhi Wang
2023-02-08 9:11 ` Mathias Krause
2023-02-14 11:08 ` Zhi Wang
2023-03-15 22:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-20 21:34 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-21 15:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-01 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix comment typo Mathias Krause
2023-02-01 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: VMX: Make CR0.WP a guest owned bit Mathias Krause
2023-03-15 22:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-20 21:31 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-06 6:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: MMU: performance tweaks for heavy CR0.WP users Mathias Krause
2023-03-06 18:07 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230207153651.000067f8@gmail.com \
--to=zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minipli@grsecurity.net \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox