public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 04/20] riscv: kernel enabling user code for shadow stack and landing pad
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 20:53:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230213045351.3945824-5-debug@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230213045351.3945824-1-debug@rivosinc.com>

Enables architectural support for shadow stack and landing pad instr
for user mode on riscv.

This patch does following
- Defines a new structure cfi_status
- Includes cfi_status in thread_info
- Defines offsets to new member fields in thread_info in asm-offsets.c
- Saves and restore cfi state on trap entry (U --> S) and exit (S --> U)

Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h   | 11 ++++++++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h |  5 ++++
 arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c      |  5 ++++
 arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S            | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
index bdebce2cc323..f065309927b1 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -41,6 +41,17 @@ struct thread_struct {
 	unsigned long bad_cause;
 };
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_USER_SHADOW_STACK) || defined(CONFIG_USER_INDIRECT_BR_LP)
+struct cfi_status {
+	unsigned int ufcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for forward cfi. Note that ELP goes in sstatus */
+	unsigned int ubcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for backward cfi. */
+	unsigned int rsvd1 : 30;
+	unsigned int lp_label; /* saved label value (25bit) */
+	long user_shdw_stk; /* Current user shadow stack pointer */
+	long shdw_stk_base; /* Base address of shadow stack */
+};
+#endif
+
 /* Whitelist the fstate from the task_struct for hardened usercopy */
 static inline void arch_thread_struct_whitelist(unsigned long *offset,
 						unsigned long *size)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 67322f878e0d..f74b8bd55d5b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -65,6 +65,11 @@ struct thread_info {
 	 */
 	long			kernel_sp;	/* Kernel stack pointer */
 	long			user_sp;	/* User stack pointer */
+#if defined(CONFIG_USER_SHADOW_STACK) || defined(CONFIG_USER_INDIRECT_BR_LP)
+	/* cfi_state only if config is defined */
+	/* state of user cfi state. note this includes LPLR and SSP as well */
+	struct cfi_status       user_cfi_state;
+#endif
 	int			cpu;
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index df9444397908..340e6413cf3c 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -38,6 +38,11 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
 	OFFSET(TASK_TI_KERNEL_SP, task_struct, thread_info.kernel_sp);
 	OFFSET(TASK_TI_USER_SP, task_struct, thread_info.user_sp);
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_USER_SHADOW_STACK) || defined(CONFIG_USER_INDIRECT_BR_LP)
+	OFFSET(TASK_TI_USER_CFI_STATUS, task_struct, thread_info.user_cfi_state);
+	OFFSET(TASK_TI_USER_LPLR, task_struct, thread_info.user_cfi_state.lp_label);
+	OFFSET(TASK_TI_USER_SSP, task_struct, thread_info.user_cfi_state.user_shdw_stk);
+#endif
 	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F0,  task_struct, thread.fstate.f[0]);
 	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F1,  task_struct, thread.fstate.f[1]);
 	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F2,  task_struct, thread.fstate.f[2]);
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
index 99d38fdf8b18..f283130c81ec 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
@@ -73,6 +73,31 @@ _save_context:
 	REG_S x30, PT_T5(sp)
 	REG_S x31, PT_T6(sp)
 
+#if	defined(CONFIG_USER_SHADOW_STACK) || defined(CONFIG_USER_INDIRECT_BR_LP)
+	/*
+	* If U --> S, CSR_SCRATCH should be holding U TP
+	* If S --> S, CSR_SCRATCH should be holding S TP
+	* s2 == tp means, previous mode was S
+	* else previous mode U
+	* we need to save cfi status only when previous mode was U
+	*/
+	csrr s2, CSR_SCRATCH
+	xor s2, s2, tp
+	beqz s2, skip_bcfi_save
+	/* load cfi status word */
+	lw s2, TASK_TI_USER_CFI_STATUS(tp)
+	andi s3, s2, 1
+	beqz s3, skip_fcfi_save
+	/* fcfi is enabled, capture ELP and LPLR state and record it */
+	csrr s3, CSR_LPLR /* record label register */
+	sw s3, TASK_TI_USER_LPLR(tp) /* save it back in thread_info structure */
+skip_fcfi_save:
+	andi s3, s2, 2
+	beqz s3, skip_bcfi_save
+	csrr s3, CSR_SSP
+	REG_S s3, TASK_TI_USER_SSP(tp) /* save user ssp in thread_info */
+skip_bcfi_save:
+#endif
 	/*
 	 * Disable user-mode memory access as it should only be set in the
 	 * actual user copy routines.
@@ -283,6 +308,21 @@ resume_userspace:
 	 */
 	csrw CSR_SCRATCH, tp
 
+#if	defined(CONFIG_USER_SHADOW_STACK) || defined(CONFIG_USER_INDIRECT_BR_LP)
+	lw s2, TASK_TI_USER_CFI_STATUS(tp)
+	andi s3, s2, 1
+	beqz s3, skip_fcfi_resume
+	xor s3, s3, s3
+	lw s3, TASK_TI_USER_LPLR(tp)
+	csrw CSR_LPLR, s3
+skip_fcfi_resume:
+	andi s3, s2, 2
+	beqz s3, skip_bcfi_resume
+	REG_L s3, TASK_TI_USER_SSP(tp) /* save user ssp in thread_info */
+	csrw CSR_SSP, s3
+skip_bcfi_resume:
+#endif
+
 restore_all:
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 	REG_L s1, PT_STATUS(sp)
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-13  4:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-13  4:53 [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 00/20] riscv control-flow integrity for U mode Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 01/20] sslp stubs: shadow stack and landing pad stubs Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 02/20] riscv: zisslpcfi enumeration Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 03/20] riscv: zisslpcfi extension csr and bit definitions Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` Deepak Gupta [this message]
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 05/20] mmap : Introducing new protection "PROT_SHADOWSTACK" for mmap Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 06/20] riscv: Implementing "PROT_SHADOWSTACK" on riscv Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 07/20] elf: ELF header parsing in GNU property for cfi state Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 08/20] riscv: ELF header parsing in GNU property for riscv zisslpcfi Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 09/20] riscv mmu: riscv shadow stack page fault handling Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 10/20] riscv mmu: write protect and shadow stack Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 11/20] mmu: maybe_mkwrite updated to manufacture shadow stack PTEs Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13 12:05   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-13 14:37     ` Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13 14:56       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-13 20:01         ` Deepak Gupta
2023-02-14 12:10           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-14 18:27             ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 12/20] riscv mm: manufacture shadow stack pte and is vma shadowstack Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 13/20] riscv: illegal instruction handler for cfi violations Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 14/20] riscv: audit mode " Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 15/20] sslp prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for shadow stack and landing pad instr Deepak Gupta
2023-05-25 17:17   ` Mark Brown
2023-06-07 20:22   ` Mark Brown
2023-10-09 21:22     ` Deepak Gupta
2023-10-10 16:17       ` Mark Brown
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 16/20] riscv: Implements sslp prctls Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 17/20] riscv ucontext: adding shadow stack pointer field in ucontext Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 18/20] riscv signal: Save and restore of shadow stack for signal Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 19/20] config: adding two new config for control flow integrity Deepak Gupta
2023-02-13  4:53 ` [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 20/20] riscv: select config for shadow stack and landing pad instr support Deepak Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230213045351.3945824-5-debug@rivosinc.com \
    --to=debug@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox