* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review
2023-02-13 14:48 [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-02-13 20:07 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-02-13 22:08 ` Allen Pais
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-02-13 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On 2/13/23 06:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.94 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:46:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.94-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review
2023-02-13 14:48 [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-13 20:07 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-02-13 22:08 ` Allen Pais
2023-02-13 23:31 ` Shuah Khan
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Allen Pais @ 2023-02-13 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.94 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:46:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.94-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review
2023-02-13 14:48 [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-13 20:07 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-02-13 22:08 ` Allen Pais
@ 2023-02-13 23:31 ` Shuah Khan
2023-02-14 3:04 ` Bagas Sanjaya
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-02-13 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Shuah Khan
On 2/13/23 07:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.94 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:46:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.94-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review
2023-02-13 14:48 [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-13 23:31 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-02-14 3:04 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-02-14 8:26 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2023-02-14 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 538 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:48:41PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.94 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.2.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review
2023-02-13 14:48 [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-14 3:04 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2023-02-14 8:26 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-02-14 10:54 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-02-14 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 20:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.94 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:46:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.94-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.15.94-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: 2bf3e29e9db2a8b1c8bc73dab34b09b09991ad11
* git describe: v5.15.93-68-g2bf3e29e9db2
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.93-68-g2bf3e29e9db2
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.93)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.93)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.93)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.93)
## Test result summary
total: 162222, pass: 135364, fail: 4592, skip: 21911, xfail: 355
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 149 total, 148 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 49 total, 47 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 39 total, 35 passed, 4 failed
* mips: 31 total, 29 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 32 passed, 2 failed
* riscv: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 16 total, 14 passed, 2 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 42 total, 40 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review
2023-02-13 14:48 [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-14 8:26 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-02-14 10:54 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2023-02-14 12:46 ` Ron Economos
2023-02-14 13:10 ` Jon Hunter
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) @ 2023-02-14 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw, rwarsow
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:48:41PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.94 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:46:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20230210):
mips: 62 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2852
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2858
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2860
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review
2023-02-13 14:48 [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-14 10:54 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
@ 2023-02-14 12:46 ` Ron Economos
2023-02-14 13:10 ` Jon Hunter
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2023-02-14 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On 2/13/23 6:48 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.94 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:46:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.94-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review
2023-02-13 14:48 [PATCH 5.15 00/67] 5.15.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-14 12:46 ` Ron Economos
@ 2023-02-14 13:10 ` Jon Hunter
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2023-02-14 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, linux-tegra
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 15:48:41 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.94 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:46:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.94-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.15:
11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
114 tests: 114 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.15.94-rc1-g2bf3e29e9db2
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread