Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] pinctrl: add NXP S32 SoC family support

Chester Lin
2023-03-08T05:03:35Z

Hi Andy,

Thanks for reviewing this patch!

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 01:28:09AM +0200, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com wrote:
> Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:33:19AM +0800, Chester Lin kirjoitti:
> > Add the pinctrl driver for NXP S32 SoC family. This driver is mainly based
> > on NXP's downstream implementation on nxp-auto-linux repo[1].
>
> Seems Linus already applied this, but still some comments for the future, some
> for the followups. However, personally I prefer this to be dropped and redone
> because too many things here and there.
>
> > [1] https://github.com/nxp-auto-linux/linux/tree/bsp35.0-5.15.73-rt/drivers/pinctrl/freescale
>
> This can be transformed to Link: tag.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Nunez <matthew.nunez@nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Phu Luu An <phu.luuan@nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan-Gabriel Mirea <stefan-gabriel.mirea@nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore@nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc <Ghennadi.Procopciuc@oss.nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrei Stefanescu <andrei.stefanescu@nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Radu Pirea <radu-nicolae.pirea@nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chester Lin <clin@suse.com>
>
> Is it for real?!
> Quite a long chain and none of Co-developed-by.
>

They are developers who contribute codes and have Signed-off-bys in NXP's downstream
version. Since their implementations can still be seen in this upstream one, I
prefer to list them all. Indeed a part of them who also actively work with me on
upstreaming this driver can be listed as Co-developed-by, but the driver patch
has been merged into the maintainer's for-next so I would not change this part
unless the driver patch needs to be reverted and re-submitted in the end.

Sorry for the patch header that I mess up anyway.

> ...
>
> > + depends on ARCH_S32 && OF
>
> Is OF necessary? Can it be

I think it's required since the driver file refers to of_* APIs.

>
> depends OF || COMPILE_TEST
>
> ?
>
> ...
>
> > + depends on ARCH_S32 && OF
>
> Ditto.
>
> ...
>
> > +/**
> > + * struct s32_pin_group - describes an S32 pin group
> > + * @name: the name of this specific pin group
> > + * @npins: the number of pins in this group array, i.e. the number of
> > + * elements in pin_ids and pin_sss so we can iterate over that array
> > + * @pin_ids: an array of pin IDs in this group
> > + * @pin_sss: an array of source signal select configs paired with pin_ids
> > + */
> > +struct s32_pin_group {
> > + const char *name;
> > + unsigned int npins;
> > + unsigned int *pin_ids;
> > + unsigned int *pin_sss;
>
> Why didn't you embed struct pingroup?
>

I did think about that but there's an additional 'pin_sss' which could make code
a bit messy. For example:

s32_regmap_update(pctldev, grp->grp.pins[i],
S32_MSCR_SSS_MASK, grp->pin_sss[i]);

> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct s32_pmx_func - describes S32 pinmux functions
> > + * @name: the name of this specific function
> > + * @groups: corresponding pin groups
> > + * @num_groups: the number of groups
> > + */
> > +struct s32_pmx_func {
> > + const char *name;
> > + const char **groups;
> > + unsigned int num_groups;
> > +};
>
> struct pinfunction.
>

Thanks for your information. I was not aware of this new struct since it just got
merged recently.

> ...
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > +int __maybe_unused s32_pinctrl_resume(struct device *dev);
> > +int __maybe_unused s32_pinctrl_suspend(struct device *dev);
> > +#endif
>
> Please, consider using new PM macros, like pm_ptr().
>

Maybe pm_sleep_ptr() is more accurate?

> ...
>
> > +static u32 get_pin_no(u32 pinmux)
> > +{
> > + return (pinmux & S32_PIN_ID_MASK) >> __ffs(S32_PIN_ID_MASK);
>
> Oh, don't you have MASK to be 2^x - 1? Why to drag this with __ffs()?
> Just define a complement _SHIFT.
>

Will fix it.

> > +}
>
> ...
>
> > + n_pins = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "pinmux", sizeof(u32));
> > + if (n_pins < 0) {
> > + dev_warn(dev, "Unable to find 'pinmux' property in node %s.\n",
> > + np->name);
>
> Use %pOFn instead of %s.
>

Will change it.

> > + } else if (!n_pins) {
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> ...
>
> > + for (i = 0; i < grp->npins; ++i) {
>
> Why pre-increment?

Will change that to keep code style consistency.

>
> > + if (s32_check_pin(pctldev, grp->pin_ids[i]) != 0) {
> > + dev_err(info->dev, "invalid pin: %d in group: %d\n",
> > + grp->pin_ids[i], group);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < grp->npins && !ret; ++i) {
>
> Ditto.
>
> > + ret = s32_regmap_update(pctldev, grp->pin_ids[i],
> > + S32_MSCR_SSS_MASK, grp->pin_sss[i]);
>
> Traditional pattern is
>
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> This avoids first assignment of the ret.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
>
> return 0;
>
> > +}
>
> ...
>
> > + ret = s32_regmap_read(pctldev, offset, &config);
> > + if (ret != 0)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Why not
>
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>

Will fix this and the following error code shadowings, return handlings and blanks.

Thanks for your reminder.

> ...
>
> > + list_add(&(gpio_pin->list), &(ipctl->gpio_configs));
>
> Too many parentheses.
>
> ...
>
> > + list_for_each_safe(pos, tmp, &ipctl->gpio_configs) {
> > + gpio_pin = list_entry(pos, struct gpio_pin_config, list);
>
> Why not list_for_each_entry_safe() ?

Will change it.

>
>
> > + if (gpio_pin->pin_id == offset) {
> > + ret = s32_regmap_write(pctldev, gpio_pin->pin_id,
> > + gpio_pin->config);
> > + if (ret != 0)
> > + goto unlock;
> > +
> > + list_del(pos);
> > + kfree(gpio_pin);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> ...
>
> > +static int s32_get_slew_regval(int arg)
> > +{
> > + int i;
>
> unsigned int i;
>
> + Blank line.
>
> > + /* Translate a real slew rate (MHz) to a register value */
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(support_slew); i++) {
> > + if (arg == support_slew[i])
> > + return i;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
>
> ...
>
> > + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> > + if (arg)
> > + *config |= S32_MSCR_PUS;
> > + else
> > + *config &= ~S32_MSCR_PUS;
>
> > + fallthrough;
>
> It's quite easy to miss this and tell us about how is it supposed to work with PU + PD?
>
I admit that it's ambiguous and should be improved in order to have better readability.

In a S32G2 MSCR register, there are two register bits related to pull up/down functions:

PUE (Pull Enable, MSCR[13]): 0'b: Disabled, 1'b: Enabled
PUS (Pull Select, MSCR[12]): 0'b: Pull Down, 1'b: Pull Up

The dt properties could be like these:

1) 'bias-pull-up' or 'bias-pull-up: true' --> arg = 1
In this case both PUE and PUS are set.

2) 'bias-pull-up: false' --> arg = 0
In this case both PUE and PUS are cleared since the pull-up function must be disabled.

> > + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> > + if (arg)
> > + *config |= S32_MSCR_PUE;
> > + else
> > + *config &= ~S32_MSCR_PUE;
> > + *mask |= S32_MSCR_PUE | S32_MSCR_PUS;
> > + break;
> > + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE:
> > + *config &= ~(S32_MSCR_ODE | S32_MSCR_OBE | S32_MSCR_IBE);
> > + *mask |= S32_MSCR_ODE | S32_MSCR_OBE | S32_MSCR_IBE;
> > + fallthrough;
>
> Ditto.
>

It's similar to the case 'PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP' although the PUS bit is assumed
as 0 via the config variable so only the PUE bit needs to be configured, for example:

1) 'bias-pull-down' or 'bias-pull-down: true' --> arg = 1
PUE is set and PUS is cleared.

2) 'bias-pull-down: false' --> arg = 0
In this case both PUE and PUS are cleared since the pull-down function must be disabled.

> > + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
> > + *config &= ~(S32_MSCR_PUS | S32_MSCR_PUE);
> > + *mask |= S32_MSCR_PUS | S32_MSCR_PUE;
> > + break;
>
> ...
>
> > + if (s32_check_pin(pctldev, pin_id) != 0)
>
> Shadowing an error?
>
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> ...
>
> > + ret = s32_regmap_update(pctldev, pin_id, mask, config);
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(ipctl->dev, "update: pin %d cfg 0x%x\n", pin_id, config);
> > +
> > + return ret;
>
> You are not using ret in between, hence
>
> return _regmap_update(...);
>
> ...
>
> > +static void s32_pinconf_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> > + struct seq_file *s, unsigned int pin_id)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int config;
> > + int ret = s32_regmap_read(pctldev, pin_id, &config);
> > +
> > + if (!ret)
> > + seq_printf(s, "0x%x", config);
>
>
> int ret;
>
> ret = s32_regmap_read(pctldev, pin_id, &config);
> if (ret)
> return;
>
> seq_printf(s, "0x%x", config);
>
> > +}
>
> ...
>
> > + npins = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "pinmux", sizeof(u32));
>
> > +
>
> Unneccessary blank line.
>
> > + if (npins < 0) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to read 'pinmux' property in node %s.\n",
> > + np->name);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + if (!npins) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "The group %s has no pins.\n", np->name);
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> ...
>
> > + grp->pin_ids = devm_kcalloc(info->dev, grp->npins,
> > + sizeof(unsigned int), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + grp->pin_sss = devm_kcalloc(info->dev, grp->npins,
> > + sizeof(unsigned int), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> > +
>
> Ditto.
>
> > + if (!grp->pin_ids || !grp->pin_sss) {
>
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate memory for the group %s.\n",
> > + np->name);
>
> We do not print ENOMEM error messages.
>

Will drop it.

> > + return;
> > + }
>
> ...
>
> > + func->groups = devm_kzalloc(info->dev,
> > + func->num_groups * sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> First of all, this is devm_kcalloc().
> Second, where is the error check?
>

Will fix it.

> > + for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> > + func->groups[i] = child->name;
> > + grp = &info->groups[info->grp_index++];
> > + s32_pinctrl_parse_groups(child, grp, info);
> > + i++;
> > + }
>
> ...
>
> > + ipctl->regions = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> > + mem_regions * sizeof(*(ipctl->regions)),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
>
> devm_kcalloc()
>
> > + if (!ipctl->regions)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> ...
>
> > + info->functions = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> > + nfuncs * sizeof(struct s32_pmx_func),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Ditto.
>
> > + if (!info->functions)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> ...
>
> > + info->groups = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> > + info->ngroups * sizeof(struct s32_pin_group),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Ditto.
>
> > + if (!info->groups)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> ...
>
> > + ipctl->pctl = devm_pinctrl_register(&pdev->dev, s32_pinctrl_desc,
> > + ipctl);
>
> > +
>
> Unneeded blank line.
>
> > + if (IS_ERR(ipctl->pctl)) {
>
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not register s32 pinctrl driver\n");
> > + return PTR_ERR(ipctl->pctl);
>
> return dev_err_probe(...);
>

Will change it, thanks!

> > + }
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/nxp/pinctrl-s32g2.c b/drivers/pinctrl/nxp/pinctrl-s32g2.c
>
> Similar issues has to be addressed, if any.
>
> ...
>
> > + return s32_pinctrl_probe
> > + (pdev, (struct s32_pinctrl_soc_info *) of_id->data);
>
> Broken indentation.
>
> ...
>

The checkpatch.pl seems not to warn this but I will definitely improve it.

> > +static const struct dev_pm_ops s32g_pinctrl_pm_ops = {
> > + SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(s32_pinctrl_suspend,
> > + s32_pinctrl_resume)
> > +};
>
> Consider using DEFINE_* PM macros.
>

You probably mean DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS. Will change it.

> ...
>
> > +static struct platform_driver s32g_pinctrl_driver = {
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "s32g-siul2-pinctrl",
>
> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>
> Duplicate assignment.

Will drop it.

>
> > + .of_match_table = s32_pinctrl_of_match,
> > + .pm = &s32g_pinctrl_pm_ops,
> > + .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> > + },
> > + .probe = s32g_pinctrl_probe,
> > +};
>
> > +
>
> Unnecessary blank line.
>
> > +builtin_platform_driver(s32g_pinctrl_driver);
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>