From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ufs: host: ufs-qcom: Return directly if MCQ resource is provided in DT
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 12:56:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230302072631.GA2890@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a3c08b5f-b8cb-fdd9-eb60-b1adc2879fff@acm.org>
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 10:07:41AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2/28/23 23:31, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Instead of using a goto label to return, let's return directly in the
> > "if" condition after setting mcq_base.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 9 ++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > index 34fc453f3eb1..d90f963eed02 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > @@ -1460,8 +1460,10 @@ static int ufs_qcom_mcq_config_resource(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > /* MCQ resource provided in DT */
> > res = &hba->res[RES_MCQ];
> > /* Bail if MCQ resource is provided */
> > - if (res->base)
> > - goto out;
> > + if (res->base) {
> > + hba->mcq_base = res->base;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > /* Explicitly allocate MCQ resource from ufs_mem */
> > res_mcq = devm_kzalloc(hba->dev, sizeof(*res_mcq), GFP_KERNEL);
> > @@ -1489,9 +1491,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_mcq_config_resource(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > goto ioremap_err;
> > }
> > -out:
> > - hba->mcq_base = res->base;
> > - return 0;
> > ioremap_err:
> > res->base = NULL;
> > remove_resource(res_mcq);
>
> This patch changes the behavior for the success case without mentioning this
> in the patch description. So I assume that the behavior change is
> unintentional and hence that this patch should be dropped?
>
Sorry, my bad here :( Please ignore this patch.
Thanks,
Mani
> Bart.
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-02 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-01 7:31 [PATCH] ufs: host: ufs-qcom: Return directly if MCQ resource is provided in DT Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-01 18:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-02 7:26 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230302072631.GA2890@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox