public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: arnd@arndb.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, josh@joshtriplett.org,
	jani.nikula@intel.com, corbet@lwn.net, jgg@mellanox.com,
	dmatlack@google.com, mizhang@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	seanjc@google.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] Regarding using 'bool' appropriately
Date: Sat,  4 Mar 2023 12:19:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230304041932.847133-1-wei.w.wang@intel.com> (raw)

When I'm working on patch 3 to change WARN/WARN_ON to use bool for
__ret_warn_on according to the documentation in CodingStyle about using
'bool', compiler reports an error from tpm2_key_encode(), and the root
cause is that it names a variable 'bool' which conficts with the data
type name 'bool'. So fix it and add a rule in CodingStyle to avoid such
naming that causes confusion. This is also the reason that the three
patches are grouped into one patchset.

Wei Wang (3):
  security: keys: don't use data type as variable name
  Documentation/CodingStyle: do not use data type names as variable
    names
  bug: use bool for __ret_warn_on in WARN/WARN_ON

 Documentation/process/coding-style.rst    |  3 +++
 include/asm-generic/bug.h                 | 12 ++++++------
 security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c |  5 +++--
 tools/include/asm/bug.h                   | 10 +++++-----
 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.27.0


             reply	other threads:[~2023-03-04  4:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-04  4:19 Wei Wang [this message]
2023-03-04  4:19 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] security: keys: don't use data type as variable name Wei Wang
2023-03-11 22:13   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-03-04  4:19 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] Documentation/CodingStyle: do not use data type names as variable names Wei Wang
2023-03-04 15:01   ` Jonathan Corbet
2023-03-06 11:03     ` Wang, Wei W
2023-03-04  4:19 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] bug: use bool for __ret_warn_on in WARN/WARN_ON Wei Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230304041932.847133-1-wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --to=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox