Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] remoteproc: k4: Split out functions common with M4 driver

Martyn Welch
2023-03-10T13:55:23Z

On Fri, 2023-03-10 at 10:53 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 10/03/23 10:46, Martyn Welch ha scritto:
> > On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 12:04 -0600, Hari Nagalla wrote:
> > > On 3/2/23 11:14, Martyn Welch wrote:
> > > > + * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier
> > > > + * @mbox: mailbox channel handle
> > > > + * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel
> > > > + * @ipc_only: flag to indicate IPC-only mode
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct k3_rproc {
> > > > +       struct device *dev;
> > > > +       struct rproc *rproc;
> > > > +       struct k3_rproc_mem *mem;
> > > > +       int num_mems;
> > > > +       struct k3_rproc_mem *rmem;
> > > > +       int num_rmems;
> > > > +       struct reset_control *reset;
> > > > +       const struct k3_rproc_dev_data *data;
> > > > +       struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
> > > > +       const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci;
> > > > +       u32 ti_sci_id;
> > > > +       struct mbox_chan *mbox;
> > > > +       struct mbox_client client;
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > "ipc_only" mode element is missing in the structure.
> >
> > That's added with the M4F driver in the next patch - it's not part
> > of
> > the structure in the DSP driver.
>
> Martyn, I get that it's added later, but the point here is that you
> are
> documenting something that is missing! :-)
>
> You should add the kerneldoc for @ipc_only: xxxx when you actually
> introduce
> the new element... otherwise, this commit alone would trigger a
> kerneldoc warning.
>

Ah! Thanks. I'd missed that I'd left the comment in there. Yep, that
needs to be added in the next patch rather than here... :-)

Martyn

> Cheers,
> Angelo