From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:47:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230310144702.1541730-1-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
for presence of a property and nothing more.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
index e85703651098..5ac6b9e5270e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static bool __init cpu0_node_has_opp_v2_prop(void)
struct device_node *np = of_cpu_device_node_get(0);
bool ret = false;
- if (of_get_property(np, "operating-points-v2", NULL))
+ if (of_property_present(np, "operating-points-v2"))
ret = true;
of_node_put(np);
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c
index 76e553af2071..535867a7dfdd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int imx_cpufreq_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(0);
- if (!of_find_property(cpu_dev->of_node, "cpu-supply", NULL))
+ if (!of_property_present(cpu_dev->of_node, "cpu-supply"))
return -ENODEV;
if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx7ulp")) {
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
index ad4ce8493144..48e1772e98fd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static int imx6q_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
u32 val;
int ret;
- if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) {
+ if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells")) {
ret = nvmem_cell_read_u32(dev, "speed_grade", &val);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static int imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
u32 val;
int ret = 0;
- if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) {
+ if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells")) {
ret = nvmem_cell_read_u32(dev, "speed_grade", &val);
if (ret)
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
index 513a071845c2..f34e6382a4c5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
#ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
/* dummy clock provider as needed by OPP if clocks property is used */
- if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "#clock-cells", NULL))
+ if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "#clock-cells"))
devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_simple_get, NULL);
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
index ab7ac7df9e62..dfd2de4f8e07 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static bool cpu0_node_has_opp_v2_prop(void)
struct device_node *np = of_cpu_device_node_get(0);
bool ret = false;
- if (of_get_property(np, "operating-points-v2", NULL))
+ if (of_property_present(np, "operating-points-v2"))
ret = true;
of_node_put(np);
--
2.39.2
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-10 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-10 14:47 Rob Herring [this message]
2023-03-13 4:28 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230310144702.1541730-1-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox