From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com
Cc: kuniyu@amazon.com, liuhangbin@gmail.com,
xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com, jiri@nvidia.com,
andy.ren@getcruise.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kerneljasonxing@gmail.com, Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: introduce budget_squeeze to help us tune rx behavior
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 00:36:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230311163614.92296-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
When we encounter some performance issue and then get lost on how
to tune the budget limit and time limit in net_rx_action() function,
we can separately counting both of them to avoid the confusion.
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
---
note: this commit is based on the link as below:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230311151756.83302-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 1 +
net/core/dev.c | 12 ++++++++----
net/core/net-procfs.c | 9 ++++++---
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 6a14b7b11766..5736311a2133 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3157,6 +3157,7 @@ struct softnet_data {
/* stats */
unsigned int processed;
unsigned int time_squeeze;
+ unsigned int budget_squeeze;
#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
struct softnet_data *rps_ipi_list;
#endif
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 253584777101..bed7a68fdb5d 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6637,6 +6637,7 @@ static __latent_entropy void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
unsigned long time_limit = jiffies +
usecs_to_jiffies(READ_ONCE(netdev_budget_usecs));
int budget = READ_ONCE(netdev_budget);
+ bool is_continue = true;
LIST_HEAD(list);
LIST_HEAD(repoll);
@@ -6644,7 +6645,7 @@ static __latent_entropy void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
list_splice_init(&sd->poll_list, &list);
local_irq_enable();
- for (;;) {
+ for (; is_continue;) {
struct napi_struct *n;
skb_defer_free_flush(sd);
@@ -6662,10 +6663,13 @@ static __latent_entropy void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
* Allow this to run for 2 jiffies since which will allow
* an average latency of 1.5/HZ.
*/
- if (unlikely(budget <= 0 ||
- time_after_eq(jiffies, time_limit))) {
+ if (unlikely(budget <= 0)) {
+ sd->budget_squeeze++;
+ is_continue = false;
+ }
+ if (unlikely(time_after_eq(jiffies, time_limit))) {
sd->time_squeeze++;
- break;
+ is_continue = false;
}
}
diff --git a/net/core/net-procfs.c b/net/core/net-procfs.c
index 97a304e1957a..4d1a499d7c43 100644
--- a/net/core/net-procfs.c
+++ b/net/core/net-procfs.c
@@ -174,14 +174,17 @@ static int softnet_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
*/
seq_printf(seq,
"%08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x "
- "%08x %08x\n",
- sd->processed, sd->dropped, sd->time_squeeze, 0,
+ "%08x %08x %08x %08x\n",
+ sd->processed, sd->dropped,
+ 0, /* was old way to count time squeeze */
+ 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, /* was fastroute */
0, /* was cpu_collision */
sd->received_rps, flow_limit_count,
0, /* was len of two backlog queues */
(int)seq->index,
- softnet_input_pkt_queue_len(sd), softnet_process_queue_len(sd));
+ softnet_input_pkt_queue_len(sd), softnet_process_queue_len(sd),
+ sd->time_squeeze, sd->budget_squeeze);
return 0;
}
--
2.37.3
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-11 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-11 16:36 Jason Xing [this message]
2023-03-11 17:14 ` [PATCH net-next] net: introduce budget_squeeze to help us tune rx behavior Stephen Hemminger
2023-03-12 0:04 ` Jason Xing
2023-03-13 2:05 ` Jason Xing
2023-03-13 20:07 ` Simon Horman
2023-03-14 1:56 ` Jason Xing
2023-03-13 21:58 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-14 1:57 ` Jason Xing
2023-03-14 8:39 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-14 9:21 ` Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230311163614.92296-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.ren@getcruise.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox