From: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: zwisler@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: use canonical ftrace path
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 14:40:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230313204050.GA592900@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230310183352.2943e633@gandalf.local.home>
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 06:33:52PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:52:09 -0700
> zwisler@kernel.org wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c
> > index 156743cf5870..4fa61ac8a0ee 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c
> > @@ -86,8 +86,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > pid = getpid();
> > bpf_map_update_elem(pidmap_fd, &key, &pid, 0);
> >
> > - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > - "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
> > + if (access("/sys/kernel/tracing/trace", F_OK) == 0)
> > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > + "/sys/kernel/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
> > + else
> > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > + "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
>
> I don't know how the BPF folks feel, but I do know some kernel developers
> prefer that if you need to break a single command into multiple lines that
> you then need to add brackets around it. As it makes it easier to read.
>
> if (access("/sys/kernel/tracing/trace", F_OK) == 0) {
> snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> "/sys/kernel/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
> } else {
> snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
> }
>
>
>
> > efd = open(buf, O_RDONLY, 0);
> > if (CHECK(efd < 0, "open", "err %d errno %d\n", efd, errno))
> > goto close_prog;
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> > index 113dba349a57..22be0a9a5a0a 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> > @@ -338,7 +338,12 @@ static int get_syms(char ***symsp, size_t *cntp, bool kernel)
> > * Filtering out duplicates by using hashmap__add, which won't
> > * add existing entry.
> > */
> > - f = fopen("/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/available_filter_functions", "r");
> > +
> > + if (access("/sys/kernel/tracing/trace", F_OK) == 0)
> > + f = fopen("/sys/kernel/tracing/available_filter_functions", "r");
> > + else
> > + f = fopen("/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/available_filter_functions", "r");
> > +
> > if (!f)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_fd_query_tp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_fd_query_tp.c
> > index c717741bf8b6..60f92fd3c37a 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_fd_query_tp.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_fd_query_tp.c
> > @@ -17,8 +17,12 @@ static void test_task_fd_query_tp_core(const char *probe_name,
> > if (CHECK(err, "bpf_prog_test_load", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
> > goto close_prog;
> >
> > - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > - "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
> > + if (access("/sys/kernel/tracing/trace", F_OK) == 0)
> > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > + "/sys/kernel/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
> > + else
> > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > + "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
>
> Same here.
>
> > efd = open(buf, O_RDONLY, 0);
> > if (CHECK(efd < 0, "open", "err %d errno %d\n", efd, errno))
> > goto close_prog;
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tp_attach_query.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tp_attach_query.c
> > index 770fcc3bb1ba..d3e377fa8e9b 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tp_attach_query.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tp_attach_query.c
> > @@ -16,8 +16,12 @@ void serial_test_tp_attach_query(void)
> > for (i = 0; i < num_progs; i++)
> > obj[i] = NULL;
> >
> > - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > - "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_switch/id");
> > + if (access("/sys/kernel/tracing/trace", F_OK) == 0)
> > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > + "/sys/kernel/tracing/events/sched/sched_switch/id");
> > + else
> > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > + "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_switch/id");
>
> and here.
>
> But perhaps the BPF folks don't care?
Sure, I agree that this is more readable. I'll gather your Reviewed-by for
patch #1, make this change, rebase to the current bpf/bpf-next and send out
v4.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-13 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-10 17:52 [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: use canonical ftrace path zwisler
2023-03-10 17:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: " zwisler
2023-03-10 23:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-03-13 20:40 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2023-03-14 5:27 ` John Fastabend
2023-03-10 23:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: " Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230313204050.GA592900@google.com \
--to=zwisler@google.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox