From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
rafael@kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
lukasz.luba@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rui.zhang@intel.com, amit.kucheria@verdurent.com,
amit.kachhap@gmail.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
Pierre.Gondois@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/17] PM: EM: Refactor struct em_perf_domain and add default_table
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 19:32:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202303151927.WD6O0PWN-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230314103357.26010-14-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Hi Lukasz,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on rafael-pm/linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on rafael-pm/thermal linus/master pavel-leds/for-next v6.3-rc2 next-20230315]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Lukasz-Luba/PM-EM-Refactor-em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies-arguments/20230314-184448
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230314103357.26010-14-lukasz.luba%40arm.com
patch subject: [PATCH 13/17] PM: EM: Refactor struct em_perf_domain and add default_table
config: x86_64-randconfig-a003 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230315/202303151927.WD6O0PWN-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/ce3aad5db08006a2a6b6d52f9c26b11448cd8bb4
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Lukasz-Luba/PM-EM-Refactor-em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies-arguments/20230314-184448
git checkout ce3aad5db08006a2a6b6d52f9c26b11448cd8bb4
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/thermal/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303151927.WD6O0PWN-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c:381:24: warning: unused variable 'table' [-Wunused-variable]
struct em_perf_state *table;
^
1 warning generated.
vim +/table +381 drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c
376
377 static unsigned int get_state_freq(struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev,
378 unsigned long state)
379 {
380 struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> 381 struct em_perf_state *table;
382 unsigned long idx;
383
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-15 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-14 10:33 [PATCH 00/17] Introduce runtime modifiable Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 01/17] PM: EM: Refactor em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies() arguments Lukasz Luba
2023-03-27 17:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-04-11 15:43 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-05-10 7:00 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-04-18 22:41 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 02/17] PM: EM: Find first CPU online while updating OPP efficiency Lukasz Luba
2023-04-11 15:40 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-05-10 7:08 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-05-15 8:47 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 03/17] PM: EM: Refactor em_pd_get_efficient_state() to be more flexible Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 04/17] PM: EM: Create a new function em_compute_costs() Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 05/17] trace: energy_model: Add trace event for EM runtime modifications Lukasz Luba
2023-04-11 15:39 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-05-10 6:59 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 06/17] PM: EM: Add update_power() callback for " Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 07/17] PM: EM: Check if the get_cost() callback is present in em_compute_costs() Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 08/17] PM: EM: Introduce runtime modifiable table Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 09/17] PM: EM: Add RCU mechanism which safely cleans the old data Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 10/17] PM: EM: Add runtime update interface to modify EM power Lukasz Luba
2023-04-11 15:40 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-05-10 6:55 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-05-15 8:48 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 11/17] PM: EM: Use runtime modified EM for CPUs energy estimation in EAS Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 12/17] PM: EM: Add argument to get_cost() for runtime modification Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 13/17] PM: EM: Refactor struct em_perf_domain and add default_table Lukasz Luba
2023-03-15 11:32 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-03-21 11:30 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 14/17] Documentation: EM: Add a new section about the design Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 15/17] Documentation: EM: Add a runtime modifiable EM design description Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 16/17] Documentation: EM: Add example with driver modifying the EM Lukasz Luba
2023-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 17/17] Documentation: EM: Describe the API of runtime modifications Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202303151927.WD6O0PWN-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=Pierre.Gondois@arm.com \
--cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
--cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox