public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@kernel.org,
	joshdon@google.com, brho@google.com, pjt@google.com,
	derkling@google.com, haoluo@google.com, dvernet@meta.com,
	dschatzberg@meta.com, dskarlat@cs.cmu.edu, riel@surriel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 23/32] sched_ext: Track tasks that are subjects of the in-flight SCX operation
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 11:33:24 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230317213333.2174969-24-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230317213333.2174969-1-tj@kernel.org>

When some SCX operations are in flight, it is known that the subject task's
rq lock is held throughout which makes it safe to access certain fields of
the task - e.g. its current task_group. We want to add SCX kfunc helpers
that can make use of this guarantee - e.g. to help determining the currently
associated CPU cgroup from the task's current task_group.

As it'd be dangerous call such a helper on a task which isn't rq lock
protected, the helper should be able to verify the input task and reject
accordingly. This patch adds sched_ext_entity.kf_tasks[] that track the
tasks which are currently being operated on by a terminal SCX operation. The
new SCX_CALL_OP_[2]TASK[_RET]() can be used when invoking SCX operations
which take tasks as arguments and the scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks() can be
used by kfunc helpers to verify the input task status.

Note that as sched_ext_entity.kf_tasks[] can't handle nesting, the tracking
is currently only limited to terminal SCX operations. If needed in the
future, this restriction can be removed by moving the tracking to the task
side with a couple per-task counters.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: David Vernet <dvernet@meta.com>
---
 include/linux/sched/ext.h |  2 +
 kernel/sched/ext.c        | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched/ext.h b/include/linux/sched/ext.h
index 2f2ee3e05904..1ed07b4bdb24 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/ext.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/ext.h
@@ -449,6 +449,7 @@ enum scx_kf_mask {
 	SCX_KF_REST		= 1 << 5, /* other rq-locked operations */
 
 	__SCX_KF_RQ_LOCKED	= SCX_KF_DISPATCH | SCX_KF_ENQUEUE | SCX_KF_REST,
+	__SCX_KF_TERMINAL	= SCX_KF_ENQUEUE | SCX_KF_REST,
 };
 
 /*
@@ -464,6 +465,7 @@ struct sched_ext_entity {
 	s32			sticky_cpu;
 	s32			holding_cpu;
 	u32			kf_mask;	/* see scx_kf_mask above */
+	struct task_struct	*kf_tasks[2];	/* see SCX_CALL_OP_TASK() */
 	atomic64_t		ops_state;
 	unsigned long		runnable_at;
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index ed35b5575b9f..ac7b2d57b656 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -239,6 +239,47 @@ do {										\
 	__ret;									\
 })
 
+/*
+ * Some kfuncs are allowed only on the tasks that are subjects of the
+ * in-progress scx_ops operation for, e.g., locking guarantees. To enforce such
+ * restrictions, the following SCX_CALL_OP_*() variants should be used when
+ * invoking scx_ops operations that take task arguments. These can only be used
+ * for non-nesting operations due to the way the tasks are tracked.
+ *
+ * kfuncs which can only operate on such tasks can in turn use
+ * scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks() to test whether the invocation is allowed on
+ * the specific task.
+ */
+#define SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(mask, op, task, args...)				\
+do {										\
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(mask & ~__SCX_KF_TERMINAL);				\
+	current->scx.kf_tasks[0] = task;					\
+	SCX_CALL_OP(mask, op, task, ##args);					\
+	current->scx.kf_tasks[0] = NULL;					\
+} while (0)
+
+#define SCX_CALL_OP_TASK_RET(mask, op, task, args...)				\
+({										\
+	__typeof__(scx_ops.op(task, ##args)) __ret;				\
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(mask & ~__SCX_KF_TERMINAL);				\
+	current->scx.kf_tasks[0] = task;					\
+	__ret = SCX_CALL_OP_RET(mask, op, task, ##args);			\
+	current->scx.kf_tasks[0] = NULL;					\
+	__ret;									\
+})
+
+#define SCX_CALL_OP_2TASKS_RET(mask, op, task0, task1, args...)			\
+({										\
+	__typeof__(scx_ops.op(task0, task1, ##args)) __ret;			\
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(mask & ~__SCX_KF_TERMINAL);				\
+	current->scx.kf_tasks[0] = task0;					\
+	current->scx.kf_tasks[1] = task1;					\
+	__ret = SCX_CALL_OP_RET(mask, op, task0, task1, ##args);		\
+	current->scx.kf_tasks[0] = NULL;					\
+	current->scx.kf_tasks[1] = NULL;					\
+	__ret;									\
+})
+
 /* @mask is constant, always inline to cull unnecessary branches */
 static __always_inline bool scx_kf_allowed(u32 mask)
 {
@@ -269,6 +310,22 @@ static __always_inline bool scx_kf_allowed(u32 mask)
 	return true;
 }
 
+/* see SCX_CALL_OP_TASK() */
+static __always_inline bool scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks(u32 mask,
+							struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	if (!scx_kf_allowed(__SCX_KF_RQ_LOCKED))
+		return false;
+
+	if (unlikely((p != current->scx.kf_tasks[0] &&
+		      p != current->scx.kf_tasks[1]))) {
+		scx_ops_error("called on a task not being operated on");
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * scx_task_iter_init - Initialize a task iterator
  * @iter: iterator to init
@@ -706,7 +763,7 @@ static void do_enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(*ddsp_taskp);
 	*ddsp_taskp = p;
 
-	SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_ENQUEUE, enqueue, p, enq_flags);
+	SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(SCX_KF_ENQUEUE, enqueue, p, enq_flags);
 
 	/*
 	 * If not directly dispatched, QUEUEING isn't clear yet and dispatch or
@@ -778,7 +835,7 @@ static void enqueue_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int enq_flags
 	add_nr_running(rq, 1);
 
 	if (SCX_HAS_OP(runnable))
-		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_REST, runnable, p, enq_flags);
+		SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(SCX_KF_REST, runnable, p, enq_flags);
 
 	do_enqueue_task(rq, p, enq_flags, sticky_cpu);
 }
@@ -803,7 +860,7 @@ static void ops_dequeue(struct task_struct *p, u64 deq_flags)
 		BUG();
 	case SCX_OPSS_QUEUED:
 		if (SCX_HAS_OP(dequeue))
-			SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_REST, dequeue, p, deq_flags);
+			SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(SCX_KF_REST, dequeue, p, deq_flags);
 
 		if (atomic64_try_cmpxchg(&p->scx.ops_state, &opss,
 					 SCX_OPSS_NONE))
@@ -854,11 +911,11 @@ static void dequeue_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int deq_flags
 	 */
 	if (SCX_HAS_OP(stopping) && task_current(rq, p)) {
 		update_curr_scx(rq);
-		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_REST, stopping, p, false);
+		SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(SCX_KF_REST, stopping, p, false);
 	}
 
 	if (SCX_HAS_OP(quiescent))
-		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_REST, quiescent, p, deq_flags);
+		SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(SCX_KF_REST, quiescent, p, deq_flags);
 
 	if (deq_flags & SCX_DEQ_SLEEP)
 		p->scx.flags |= SCX_TASK_DEQD_FOR_SLEEP;
@@ -877,7 +934,7 @@ static void yield_task_scx(struct rq *rq)
 	struct task_struct *p = rq->curr;
 
 	if (SCX_HAS_OP(yield))
-		SCX_CALL_OP_RET(SCX_KF_REST, yield, p, NULL);
+		SCX_CALL_OP_2TASKS_RET(SCX_KF_REST, yield, p, NULL);
 	else
 		p->scx.slice = 0;
 }
@@ -887,7 +944,7 @@ static bool yield_to_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *to)
 	struct task_struct *from = rq->curr;
 
 	if (SCX_HAS_OP(yield))
-		return SCX_CALL_OP_RET(SCX_KF_REST, yield, from, to);
+		return SCX_CALL_OP_2TASKS_RET(SCX_KF_REST, yield, from, to);
 	else
 		return false;
 }
@@ -1398,7 +1455,7 @@ static void set_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
 
 	/* see dequeue_task_scx() on why we skip when !QUEUED */
 	if (SCX_HAS_OP(running) && (p->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_QUEUED))
-		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_REST, running, p);
+		SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(SCX_KF_REST, running, p);
 
 	watchdog_unwatch_task(p, true);
 
@@ -1454,7 +1511,7 @@ static void put_prev_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 
 	/* see dequeue_task_scx() on why we skip when !QUEUED */
 	if (SCX_HAS_OP(stopping) && (p->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_QUEUED))
-		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_REST, stopping, p, true);
+		SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(SCX_KF_REST, stopping, p, true);
 
 	/*
 	 * If we're being called from put_prev_task_balance(), balance_scx() may
@@ -1617,8 +1674,8 @@ static int select_task_rq_scx(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flag
 	if (SCX_HAS_OP(select_cpu)) {
 		s32 cpu;
 
-		cpu = SCX_CALL_OP_RET(SCX_KF_REST, select_cpu, p, prev_cpu,
-				      wake_flags);
+		cpu = SCX_CALL_OP_TASK_RET(SCX_KF_REST, select_cpu, p, prev_cpu,
+					   wake_flags);
 		if (ops_cpu_valid(cpu)) {
 			return cpu;
 		} else {
@@ -1644,8 +1701,8 @@ static void set_cpus_allowed_scx(struct task_struct *p,
 	 * designation pointless. Cast it away when calling the operation.
 	 */
 	if (SCX_HAS_OP(set_cpumask))
-		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_REST, set_cpumask, p,
-			    (struct cpumask *)p->cpus_ptr);
+		SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(SCX_KF_REST, set_cpumask, p,
+				 (struct cpumask *)p->cpus_ptr);
 }
 
 static void reset_idle_masks(void)
@@ -1806,7 +1863,7 @@ static void scx_ops_enable_task(struct task_struct *p)
 
 	if (SCX_HAS_OP(enable)) {
 		struct scx_enable_args args = { };
-		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_REST, enable, p, &args);
+		SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(SCX_KF_REST, enable, p, &args);
 	}
 	p->scx.flags &= ~SCX_TASK_OPS_PREPPED;
 	p->scx.flags |= SCX_TASK_OPS_ENABLED;
@@ -1845,7 +1902,7 @@ static void refresh_scx_weight(struct task_struct *p)
 
 	p->scx.weight = sched_weight_to_cgroup(weight);
 	if (SCX_HAS_OP(set_weight))
-		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_REST, set_weight, p, p->scx.weight);
+		SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(SCX_KF_REST, set_weight, p, p->scx.weight);
 }
 
 void scx_pre_fork(struct task_struct *p)
@@ -1936,8 +1993,8 @@ static void switching_to_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 	 * different scheduler class. Keep the BPF scheduler up-to-date.
 	 */
 	if (SCX_HAS_OP(set_cpumask))
-		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_REST, set_cpumask, p,
-			    (struct cpumask *)p->cpus_ptr);
+		SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(SCX_KF_REST, set_cpumask, p,
+				 (struct cpumask *)p->cpus_ptr);
 }
 
 static void check_preempt_curr_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,int wake_flags) {}
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-17 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-17 21:33 [PATCHSET v3] sched: Implement BPF extensible scheduler class Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 01/32] cgroup: Implement cgroup_show_cftypes() Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 02/32] sched: Encapsulate task attribute change sequence into a helper macro Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 03/32] sched: Restructure sched_class order sanity checks in sched_init() Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 04/32] sched: Allow sched_cgroup_fork() to fail and introduce sched_cancel_fork() Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 05/32] sched: Add sched_class->reweight_task() Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 06/32] sched: Add sched_class->switching_to() and expose check_class_changing/changed() Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 07/32] sched: Factor out cgroup weight conversion functions Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 08/32] sched: Expose css_tg(), __setscheduler_prio() and SCHED_CHANGE_BLOCK() Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 09/32] sched: Enumerate CPU cgroup file types Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 10/32] sched: Add @reason to sched_class->rq_{on|off}line() Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 11/32] sched: Add normal_policy() Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 12/32] sched_ext: Add boilerplate for extensible scheduler class Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 13/32] sched_ext: Implement BPF " Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 14/32] sched_ext: Add scx_example_simple and scx_example_qmap example schedulers Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 15/32] sched_ext: Add sysrq-S which disables the BPF scheduler Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 16/32] sched_ext: Implement runnable task stall watchdog Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 17/32] sched_ext: Allow BPF schedulers to disallow specific tasks from joining SCHED_EXT Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 18/32] sched_ext: Allow BPF schedulers to switch all eligible tasks into sched_ext Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 19/32] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_kick_cpu() and task preemption support Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 20/32] sched_ext: Make watchdog handle ops.dispatch() looping stall Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 21/32] sched_ext: Add task state tracking operations Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 22/32] sched_ext: Implement tickless support Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 24/32] sched_ext: Add cgroup support Tejun Heo
2023-04-20 20:02   ` Andrea Righi
2023-04-21 14:32     ` Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 25/32] sched_ext: Implement SCX_KICK_WAIT Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 26/32] sched_ext: Implement sched_ext_ops.cpu_acquire/release() Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 27/32] sched_ext: Implement sched_ext_ops.cpu_online/offline() Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 28/32] sched_ext: Implement core-sched support Tejun Heo
2023-04-20 19:56   ` Andrea Righi
2023-04-21 14:31     ` Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 29/32] sched_ext: Add vtime-ordered priority queue to dispatch_q's Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 30/32] sched_ext: Documentation: scheduler: Document extensible scheduler class Tejun Heo
2023-03-18  2:05   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 31/32] sched_ext: Add a basic, userland vruntime scheduler Tejun Heo
2023-03-17 21:33 ` [PATCH 32/32] sched_ext: Add a rust userspace hybrid example scheduler Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230317213333.2174969-24-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brho@google.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=derkling@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=dschatzberg@meta.com \
    --cc=dskarlat@cs.cmu.edu \
    --cc=dvernet@meta.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=joshdon@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox