Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/6] net: dsa: propagate flags down towards drivers

Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-27T22:59:42Z

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 11:49:58PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
> My first approach was to use the SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE event
> and not the SWITCHDEV_FDB_OFFLOADED event as the first would set the
> external learned flag which is not aged out by the bridge.

Link to patch? I don't see any SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE call in
either the v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230130173429.3577450-6-netdev@kapio-technology.com/
or the RFC:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230117185714.3058453-6-netdev@kapio-technology.com/
and the change log does not mention it either.

> I have at some point earlier asked why there would be two quite
> equivalent flags and what the difference between them are, but I didn't
> get a response.

Actually, the part which you are now posing as a question (what is the
difference?) was part of the premise of your earlier question (there is
no difference => why do we have both?).
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/d972e76bed896b229d9df4da81ad8eb4@kapio-technology.com/

I believe that no one answered because the question was confused and it
wasn't really clear what you were asking.

>
> Now I see the difference and that I cannot use the offloaded flag
> without changing the behaviour of the system as I actually change the
> behaviour of the offloaded flag in this version of the patch-set.
>
> So if the idea of a 'synthetically' learned fdb entry from the driver
> using the SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE event from the driver towards the
> bridge instead is accepted, I can go with that?
> (thus removing all the changes in the patch-set regarding the offloaded
> flag ofcourse)

which idea is that, again?