public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] fscrypt fix for v6.3-rc4
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 22:03:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230321020313.GA108653@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230320225934.GB21979@sol.localdomain>

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:59:34PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> 
> Yes, I agree that most of the WARN_ONs should be WARN_ON_ONCEs.  I think I've
> been assuming that WARN_ON is significantly more lightweight than WARN_ON_ONCE.
> But that doesn't seem to be the case, especially since commit 19d436268dde
> ("debug: Add _ONCE() logic to report_bug()").

Another option is WARN_RATELIMITED.

As an unrelated side-note, one of the things I've been working on in
some of the ext4 code paths when I've been moving BUG_ON's to
WARN_RATELIMITED is to think about what might be needed to debug a
problem, and sometimes it can be helpful to use a printf string to
provide more context than just a WARN_ON.

Cheers,

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-21  2:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-20 20:56 [GIT PULL] fscrypt fix for v6.3-rc4 Eric Biggers
2023-03-20 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-03-20 22:59   ` Eric Biggers
2023-03-21  2:03     ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2023-03-21 19:03       ` Linus Torvalds
2023-03-20 22:40 ` pr-tracker-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230321020313.GA108653@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox