From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/6] iommu: Move lock from iommu_change_dev_def_domain() to its caller
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:49:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230322064956.263419-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230322064956.263419-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
The intention is to make it possible to put group ownership check and
default domain change in a same critical region protected by the group's
mutex lock. No intentional functional change.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 6d27fd585e75..54a5bd79d21b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -2889,7 +2889,7 @@ static int iommu_change_dev_def_domain(struct iommu_group *group,
int ret, dev_def_dom;
struct device *dev;
- mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&group->mutex);
if (group->default_domain != group->domain) {
dev_err_ratelimited(prev_dev, "Group not assigned to default domain\n");
@@ -2978,28 +2978,15 @@ static int iommu_change_dev_def_domain(struct iommu_group *group,
goto free_new_domain;
group->domain = group->default_domain;
-
- /*
- * Release the mutex here because ops->probe_finalize() call-back of
- * some vendor IOMMU drivers calls arm_iommu_attach_device() which
- * in-turn might call back into IOMMU core code, where it tries to take
- * group->mutex, resulting in a deadlock.
- */
- mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
-
- /* Make sure dma_ops is appropriatley set */
- iommu_group_do_probe_finalize(dev, group->default_domain);
iommu_domain_free(prev_dom);
+
return 0;
free_new_domain:
iommu_domain_free(group->default_domain);
group->default_domain = prev_dom;
group->domain = prev_dom;
-
out:
- mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
-
return ret;
}
@@ -3089,7 +3076,19 @@ static ssize_t iommu_group_store_type(struct iommu_group *group,
goto out;
}
+ mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
ret = iommu_change_dev_def_domain(group, dev, req_type);
+ /*
+ * Release the mutex here because ops->probe_finalize() call-back of
+ * some vendor IOMMU drivers calls arm_iommu_attach_device() which
+ * in-turn might call back into IOMMU core code, where it tries to take
+ * group->mutex, resulting in a deadlock.
+ */
+ mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
+
+ /* Make sure dma_ops is appropriatley set */
+ if (!ret)
+ iommu_group_do_probe_finalize(dev, group->default_domain);
ret = ret ?: count;
out:
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-22 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-22 6:49 [PATCH v4 0/6] iommu: Extend changing default domain to normal group Lu Baolu
2023-03-22 6:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Call arm_iommu_release_mapping() in release path Lu Baolu
2023-03-22 6:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] iommu: Split iommu_group_remove_device() into helpers Lu Baolu
2023-03-22 6:49 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] iommu: Same critical region for device release and removal Lu Baolu
2023-03-22 6:49 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2023-03-22 6:49 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] iommu: Replace device_lock() with group->mutex Lu Baolu
2023-03-22 6:49 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] iommu: Cleanup iommu_change_dev_def_domain() Lu Baolu
2023-03-22 14:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] iommu: Extend changing default domain to normal group Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230322064956.263419-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox