Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/psi: allow unprivileged polling of N*2s period

[Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>]

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:33:50AM +0100, Domenico Cerasuolo wrote:
> @@ -151,6 +151,14 @@ struct psi_trigger {
>  
>  	/* Deferred event(s) from previous ratelimit window */
>  	bool pending_event;
> +
> +	/* Used to differentiate destruction action*/
> +	enum psi_aggregators aggregator;
> +};
> +
> +struct trigger_info {
> +	struct list_head triggers;
> +	u32 nr_triggers[NR_PSI_STATES - 1];
>  };
>  
>  struct psi_group {
> @@ -186,8 +194,7 @@ struct psi_group {
>  	struct mutex trigger_lock;
>  
>  	/* Configured polling triggers */
> -	struct list_head triggers;
> -	u32 nr_triggers[NR_PSI_STATES - 1];
> +	struct trigger_info trig_info[NR_PSI_AGGREGATORS];
>  	u32 poll_states;
>  	u64 poll_min_period;

Thanks for trying out this variant, but I think this is grouping up
unrelated things, and that makes the code more difficult to understand
and maintan.

The *only* thing that's shared between those two is the
update_triggers() part. trig_info[PSI_AVGS] doesn't use trigger_lock.
It also doesn't use poll_task, poll_wait, poll_wakeup, poll_scheduled,
poll_min_period, polling_next_update and polling_until. All these
things are specific to the rt polling thread.

The rename in the previous version is a bit churny, but it's justified
in order to keep unrelated things separate / make it obvious which
parts belong together, and who is reading and writing which fields.

So my vote would be on the previous version.