public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: Virtualize FLUSH_L1D and passthrough MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 10:48:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230324104803.000036e9.zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZBzQDv9gIHIhOP8Y@google.com>

On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:17:50 -0700
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 06:14:39PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > > index 85bb535fc321..b32edaf5a74b 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > > @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ static const struct svm_direct_access_msrs {
> > >  #endif
> > >  	{ .index = MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL,			.always = false },
> > >  	{ .index = MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD,			.always = false },
> > > +	{ .index = MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD,			.always = false },
> > >  	{ .index = MSR_IA32_LASTBRANCHFROMIP,		.always = false },
> > >  	{ .index = MSR_IA32_LASTBRANCHTOIP,		.always = false },
> > >  	{ .index = MSR_IA32_LASTINTFROMIP,		.always = false },
> > > @@ -4140,6 +4141,10 @@ static void svm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > >  		set_msr_interception(vcpu, svm->msrpm, MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD, 0,
> > >  				     !!guest_has_pred_cmd_msr(vcpu));
> > >  
> > > +	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FLUSH_L1D))
> > 
> > Just curious, will this ever be true on AMD hardware? AFAIK,
> > X86_FEATURE_FLUSH_L1D is Intel-defined CPU feature.
> 
> Don't know myself, but I assume/home there was actual motivation behind adding
> support for AMD.

Hmm. I took a look on the APM[1] published on Jan 2023, 3.2.9 Speculation
control MSRs. It only has SPEC_CTL/PRED_SMD so far. Also, the information
here [2] shows this is a mitigation only for Intel CPUs. Looks like AMD
does not require this so far.

[1] https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/40332.pdf
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/hw-vuln/l1tf.html

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-24  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-22  1:14 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86: Unhost the *_CMD MSR mess Sean Christopherson
2023-03-22  1:14 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86: Revert MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD.FLUSH_L1D enabling Sean Christopherson
2023-03-22  8:15   ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-22  1:14 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: VMX: Passthrough MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD based purely on host+guest CPUID Sean Christopherson
2023-03-27  3:46   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-03-22  1:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: SVM: " Sean Christopherson
2023-03-22  1:14 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: x86: Move MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD WRMSR emulation to common code Sean Christopherson
2023-03-27  6:41   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-03-22  1:14 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: Virtualize FLUSH_L1D and passthrough MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD Sean Christopherson
2023-03-23  5:07   ` Pawan Gupta
2023-03-23 22:17     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-24  8:48       ` Zhi Wang [this message]
2023-03-27  3:33   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-03-27 15:37     ` Jim Mattson
2023-03-27 16:00       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-22  1:14 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: SVM: Return the local "r" variable from svm_set_msr() Sean Christopherson
2023-03-23 22:46 ` [PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86: Unhost the *_CMD MSR mess Sean Christopherson
2023-03-27 15:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-03-27 15:28   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-27 15:46     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-04-12 19:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-04-12 20:00   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230324104803.000036e9.zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com \
    --to=zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox