From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B32BC761A6 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 07:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232289AbjC1HqY (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2023 03:46:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60016 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232220AbjC1HqT (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2023 03:46:19 -0400 Received: from elvis.franken.de (elvis.franken.de [193.175.24.41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1304492; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uucp (helo=alpha) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1ph41q-0003r6-00; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 09:46:02 +0200 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2C9BFC1C6A; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 09:45:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 09:45:11 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jiaxun Yang , "linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, Rob Herring , m.szyprowski@samsung.com, Robin Murphy , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Use dma_default_coherent for devicetree default coherency Message-ID: <20230328074511.GA6188@alpha.franken.de> References: <20230321110813.26808-1-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> <20230323072944.GA18524@lst.de> <60D7FE31-D708-4495-949F-3F64DDC11377@flygoat.com> <20230323213930.GA7730@lst.de> <20230328011812.GA21977@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230328011812.GA21977@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 03:18:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:17:38AM +0000, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > > > > > Is patch a 6.3 candidate or should all of it go into 6.4? > > > > Please leave it for 6.4, as corresponding MIPS arch part will be a part of 6.4. > > Ok. I'll really need review from the MIPS and drivers/of/ maintainers, > through. I don't see any MIPS changes in the series besides the ifdef CONFIG_MIPS part in patch 1, which gets removed again in patch 4 (chance to drop that completely ?). I've merged the corresponding MIPS patches into mips-next last week. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]