public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Crystal Wood <swood@redhat.com>, John Keeping <john@metanate.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] locking/rtmutex: Do the trylock-slowpath with DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES enabled.
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 18:54:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230328165430.9eOXd-55@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230322162719.wYG1N0hh@linutronix.de>

With DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES enabled the fast-path locking
(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire()) always fails. This leads to the invocation
of blk_flush_plug() even if the lock is not acquired which is
unnecessary and avoids batch processing of requests.

rt_mutex_slowtrylock() performs the trylock-slowpath and acquires the
lock if possible.
__rt_mutex_trylock() performs the fastpath try-lock and the slowpath
trylock. The latter is not desired in the non-debug case because it
fails very often even after rt_mutex_owner() reported that there is no
owner.
Here some numbers from a boot up + a few FS operations, hackbench:
- total __rt_mutex_lock() -> __rt_mutex_trylock() invocations with no
  owner: 32160
- success: 189
- failed: 31971
  - RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS was set the whole time: 27469
  - owner appeared after the wait_lock has been obtained: 4502

The slowlock trylock failed in most cases without an owner because a
waiter was pending and did not acquire the lock yet. The few cases in
which it succeeded were because the pending bit was cleared after the
wait_lock was acquired.
Based on these numbers, rt_mutex_slowtrylock() in the non-DEBUG case
adds just overhead without contributing anything to the locking process.

In a dist-upgrade test with DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES enabled, the here proposed
rt_mutex_slowtrylock() optimisation acquired all locks with
current->plug set and avoided a blk_flush_plug() invocation.

Use rt_mutex_slowtrylock() in the DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES case to acquire the
lock instead the disabled rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire().

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
On 2023-03-22 17:27:21 [+0100], To Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Aside of that for CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y builds it flushes on every
> > lock operation whether the lock is contended or not.
> 
> For mutex & ww_mutex operations. rwsem is not affected by
> CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES. As for mutex it could be mitigated by invoking
> try_to_take_rt_mutex() before blk_flush_plug().

This fixes the problem. I only observed blk_flush_plug() invocations
from down_read()/rwbase_read_lock() and down() which are not affected by
CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES.
I haven't observed anything in the ww-mutex path so we can ignore it or
do something similar to this.

 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index c1bc2cb1522cb..08c599a5089a2 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1698,9 +1698,18 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 					   unsigned int state)
 {
+	/*
+	 * With DEBUG enabled cmpxchg trylock will always fail. Instead of
+	 * invoking blk_flush_plug() try the trylock-slowpath first which will
+	 * succeed if the lock is not contended.
+	 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
+	if (likely(rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock)))
+		return 0;
+#else
 	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current)))
 		return 0;
-
+#endif
 	/*
 	 * If we are going to sleep and we have plugged IO queued, make sure to
 	 * submit it to avoid deadlocks.
-- 
2.40.0

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-28 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-22 16:27 [PATCH] locking/rtmutex: Flush the plug before entering the slowpath Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-03-28 16:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2023-04-21 17:58   ` [PATCH] locking/rtmutex: Do the trylock-slowpath with DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES enabled Thomas Gleixner
2023-04-24  8:42     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-04-18 15:18 ` [PATCH] locking/rtmutex: Flush the plug before entering the slowpath Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-04-18 23:43   ` Crystal Wood
2023-04-19 14:04     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-04-24 23:22       ` Crystal Wood
2023-04-21 19:18 ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230328165430.9eOXd-55@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=john@metanate.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=swood@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox