From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/EDR: Clear PCIe Device Status errors after EDR error recovery
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:09:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230329220927.GA3086137@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230315235449.1279209-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
[+cc Jonathan, author of 068c29a248b6]
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 04:54:49PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> Commit 068c29a248b6 ("PCI/ERR: Clear PCIe Device Status errors only if
> OS owns AER") adds support to clear error status in the Device Status
> Register(DEVSTA) only if OS owns the AER support. But this change
> breaks the requirement of the EDR feature which requires OS to cleanup
> the error registers even if firmware owns the control of AER support.
>
> More details about this requirement can be found in PCIe Firmware
> specification v3.3, Table 4-6 Interpretation of the _OSC Control Field.
> If the OS supports the Error Disconnect Recover (EDR) feature and
> firmware sends the EDR event, then during the EDR recovery window, OS
> is responsible for the device error recovery and holds the ownership of
> the following error registers.
>
> • Device Status Register
> • Uncorrectable Error Status Register
> • Correctable Error Status Register
> • Root Error Status Register
> • RP PIO Status Register
>
> So call pcie_clear_device_status() in edr_handle_event() if the error
> recovery is successful.
IIUC, after ac1c8e35a326 ("PCI/DPC: Add Error Disconnect Recover (EDR)
support") appeared in v5.7-rc1, DEVSTA was always cleared in this path:
edr_handle_event
pcie_do_recovery
pcie_clear_device_status
After 068c29a248b6 ("PCI/ERR: Clear PCIe Device Status errors only if
OS owns AER") appeared in v5.9-rc1, we only clear DEVSTA if the OS
owns the AER Capability:
edr_handle_event
pcie_do_recovery
if (pcie_aer_is_native(dev)) # <-- new test
pcie_clear_device_status
So in the case where the OS does *not* own AER, and it receives an EDR
notification, DEVSTA is not cleared when it should be. Right?
I assume we should have a Fixes: tag here, since this patch should be
backported to every kernel that contains 068c29a248b6. Possibly even
a stable tag, although it's arguable whether it's "critical" per
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst.
> Reported-by: Tsaur Erwin <erwin.tsaur@intel.com>
I assume this report was internal, and there's no mailing list post or
bugzilla issue URL we can include here?
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Rebased on top of v6.3-rc1.
> * Fixed a typo in pcie_clear_device_status().
>
> drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c
> index a6b9b479b97a..87734e4c3c20 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ static void edr_handle_event(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
> */
> if (estate == PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
> pci_dbg(edev, "DPC port successfully recovered\n");
> + pcie_clear_device_status(edev);
It's a little weird to work around a change inside pcie_do_recovery()
by clearing it here, and that means we clear it twice in the AER
native case, but I don't see any simpler way to do this, so this seems
fine as the fix for the current issue.
Question though: in the AER native case, pcie_do_recovery() calls
both:
pcie_clear_device_status() and
pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status()
In this patch, you only call pcie_clear_device_status(). Do you care
about pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(), too?
The overall design for clearing status has gotten pretty complicated
as we've added error handling methods (firmware-first, DPC, EDR), and
there are so many different places and cases that it's hard to be sure
we do them all correctly.
I don't really know how to clean this up, so I'm just attaching my
notes about the current state:
- AER native handling:
handle_error_source
if (info->severity == AER_CORRECTABLE)
clear PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS <--
if (pcie_aer_is_native(dev))
pdrv->err_handler->cor_error_detected()
pcie_clear_device_status
clear PCI_EXP_DEVSTA <--
else
pcie_do_recovery
pcie_clear_device_status
clear PCI_EXP_DEVSTA <--
pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status
clear PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS <--
- Firmware-first handling: status is cleared by firmware before
event is reported to OS via HEST
- DPC native handling:
dpc_handler
dpc_process_error
if (rp_extensions)
dpc_process_rp_pio_error
clear PCI_EXP_DPC_RP_PIO_STATUS <--
else if (...)
pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status
clear PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS <--
pci_aer_clear_fatal_status
clear PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS <--
pcie_do_recovery
if (AER native)
pcie_clear_device_status
clear PCI_EXP_DEVSTA <--
pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status
clear PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS <--
- EDR event handling:
edr_handle_event
dpc_process_error
if (rp_extensions)
dpc_process_rp_pio_error
clear PCI_EXP_DPC_RP_PIO_STATUS <--
else if (...)
pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status
clear PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS <--
pci_aer_clear_fatal_status
clear PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS <--
pci_aer_raw_clear_status
clear PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS <--
clear PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS <--
clear PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS <--
pcie_do_recovery
if (AER native)
pcie_clear_device_status
clear PCI_EXP_DEVSTA <--
pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status
clear PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS <--
if (PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED)
pcie_clear_device_status
clear PCI_EXP_DEVSTA <--
> acpi_send_edr_status(pdev, edev, EDR_OST_SUCCESS);
> } else {
> pci_dbg(edev, "DPC port recovery failed\n");
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-29 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-15 23:54 [PATCH v2] PCI/EDR: Clear PCIe Device Status errors after EDR error recovery Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2023-03-24 17:53 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-03-29 22:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2023-03-29 22:38 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-03-30 15:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-31 6:46 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-03-31 15:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-06 21:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-06 21:52 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-04-06 22:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-06 22:46 ` Natu, Mahesh
2023-04-07 5:31 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-04-07 16:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-07 22:19 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-04-07 22:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-07 21:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-07 21:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-07 22:25 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-04-07 22:21 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230329220927.GA3086137@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox