public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, hch@lst.de,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 14/20] srcu: Move srcu_barrier() fields from srcu_struct to srcu_usage
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:47:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230330224726.662344-14-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1b6cd5f-f0b7-4748-abd5-0dcfef0ce126@paulmck-laptop>

This commit moves the ->srcu_barrier_seq, ->srcu_barrier_mutex,
->srcu_barrier_completion, and ->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt fields from the
srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of
the former in order to improve cache locality.

Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/srcutree.h | 14 +++++++-------
 kernel/rcu/srcutree.c    | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/srcutree.h b/include/linux/srcutree.h
index d3534ecb806e..d544ec1c0c8e 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcutree.h
@@ -77,6 +77,13 @@ struct srcu_usage {
 	unsigned long srcu_n_lock_retries;	/* Contention events in current interval. */
 	unsigned long srcu_n_exp_nodelay;	/* # expedited no-delays in current GP phase. */
 	bool sda_is_static;			/* May ->sda be passed to free_percpu()? */
+	unsigned long srcu_barrier_seq;		/* srcu_barrier seq #. */
+	struct mutex srcu_barrier_mutex;	/* Serialize barrier ops. */
+	struct completion srcu_barrier_completion;
+						/* Awaken barrier rq at end. */
+	atomic_t srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt;		/* # CPUs not yet posting a */
+						/*  callback for the barrier */
+						/*  operation. */
 };
 
 /*
@@ -85,13 +92,6 @@ struct srcu_usage {
 struct srcu_struct {
 	unsigned int srcu_idx;			/* Current rdr array element. */
 	struct srcu_data __percpu *sda;		/* Per-CPU srcu_data array. */
-	unsigned long srcu_barrier_seq;		/* srcu_barrier seq #. */
-	struct mutex srcu_barrier_mutex;	/* Serialize barrier ops. */
-	struct completion srcu_barrier_completion;
-						/* Awaken barrier rq at end. */
-	atomic_t srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt;		/* # CPUs not yet posting a */
-						/*  callback for the barrier */
-						/*  operation. */
 	unsigned long reschedule_jiffies;
 	unsigned long reschedule_count;
 	struct delayed_work work;
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 20f2373f7e25..97d1fe9a160c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -248,9 +248,9 @@ static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool is_static)
 	mutex_init(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_mutex);
 	ssp->srcu_idx = 0;
 	ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_seq = 0;
-	ssp->srcu_barrier_seq = 0;
-	mutex_init(&ssp->srcu_barrier_mutex);
-	atomic_set(&ssp->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt, 0);
+	ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_seq = 0;
+	mutex_init(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_mutex);
+	atomic_set(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt, 0);
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ssp->work, process_srcu);
 	ssp->srcu_sup->sda_is_static = is_static;
 	if (!is_static)
@@ -1496,8 +1496,8 @@ static void srcu_barrier_cb(struct rcu_head *rhp)
 
 	sdp = container_of(rhp, struct srcu_data, srcu_barrier_head);
 	ssp = sdp->ssp;
-	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ssp->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt))
-		complete(&ssp->srcu_barrier_completion);
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt))
+		complete(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_completion);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1511,13 +1511,13 @@ static void srcu_barrier_cb(struct rcu_head *rhp)
 static void srcu_barrier_one_cpu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct srcu_data *sdp)
 {
 	spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(sdp);
-	atomic_inc(&ssp->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt);
+	atomic_inc(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt);
 	sdp->srcu_barrier_head.func = srcu_barrier_cb;
 	debug_rcu_head_queue(&sdp->srcu_barrier_head);
 	if (!rcu_segcblist_entrain(&sdp->srcu_cblist,
 				   &sdp->srcu_barrier_head)) {
 		debug_rcu_head_unqueue(&sdp->srcu_barrier_head);
-		atomic_dec(&ssp->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt);
+		atomic_dec(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt);
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(sdp);
 }
@@ -1530,20 +1530,20 @@ void srcu_barrier(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 {
 	int cpu;
 	int idx;
-	unsigned long s = rcu_seq_snap(&ssp->srcu_barrier_seq);
+	unsigned long s = rcu_seq_snap(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_seq);
 
 	check_init_srcu_struct(ssp);
-	mutex_lock(&ssp->srcu_barrier_mutex);
-	if (rcu_seq_done(&ssp->srcu_barrier_seq, s)) {
+	mutex_lock(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_mutex);
+	if (rcu_seq_done(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_seq, s)) {
 		smp_mb(); /* Force ordering following return. */
-		mutex_unlock(&ssp->srcu_barrier_mutex);
+		mutex_unlock(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_mutex);
 		return; /* Someone else did our work for us. */
 	}
-	rcu_seq_start(&ssp->srcu_barrier_seq);
-	init_completion(&ssp->srcu_barrier_completion);
+	rcu_seq_start(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_seq);
+	init_completion(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_completion);
 
 	/* Initial count prevents reaching zero until all CBs are posted. */
-	atomic_set(&ssp->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt, 1);
+	atomic_set(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt, 1);
 
 	idx = __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(ssp);
 	if (smp_load_acquire(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_size_state) < SRCU_SIZE_WAIT_BARRIER)
@@ -1554,12 +1554,12 @@ void srcu_barrier(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 	__srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(ssp, idx);
 
 	/* Remove the initial count, at which point reaching zero can happen. */
-	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ssp->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt))
-		complete(&ssp->srcu_barrier_completion);
-	wait_for_completion(&ssp->srcu_barrier_completion);
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt))
+		complete(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_completion);
+	wait_for_completion(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_completion);
 
-	rcu_seq_end(&ssp->srcu_barrier_seq);
-	mutex_unlock(&ssp->srcu_barrier_mutex);
+	rcu_seq_end(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_seq);
+	mutex_unlock(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_mutex);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_barrier);
 
-- 
2.40.0.rc2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-30 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-30 22:47 [PATCH rcu 0/20] Further shrink srcu_struct to promote cache locality Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 01/20] rcu-tasks: Fix warning for unused tasks_rcu_exit_srcu Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-31 11:58   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-03-31 18:35     ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 02/20] srcu: Add whitespace to __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT() & __DEFINE_SRCU() Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 03/20] srcu: Use static init for statically allocated in-module srcu_struct Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 04/20] srcu: Begin offloading srcu_struct fields to srcu_update Paul E. McKenney
2023-04-04  0:35   ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-04  1:06     ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-04-04  1:16       ` Joel Fernandes
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 05/20] srcu: Move ->level from srcu_struct to srcu_usage Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 06/20] srcu: Move ->srcu_size_state " Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 07/20] srcu: Move ->srcu_cb_mutex " Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 08/20] srcu: Move ->lock initialization after srcu_usage allocation Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 09/20] srcu: Move ->lock from srcu_struct to srcu_usage Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 10/20] srcu: Move ->srcu_gp_mutex " Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 11/20] srcu: Move grace-period fields " Paul E. McKenney
2023-06-01 11:14   ` Jon Hunter
     [not found]     ` <CALm+0cVXGdLNQpfJxnAnq2j2Ybs_rVAEqNzxgLSq7bDJp1KnfA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-06-01 13:46       ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-06-01 17:14         ` Jon Hunter
2023-06-01 19:21           ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-06-02  2:52         ` Z qiang
2023-06-02  3:09           ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-06-04  9:53     ` Linux regression tracking #adding (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 12/20] srcu: Move heuristics " Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 13/20] srcu: Move ->sda_is_static " Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 15/20] srcu: Move work-scheduling fields " Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 16/20] srcu: Check for readers at module-exit time Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 17/20] srcu: Fix long lines in srcu_get_delay() Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 18/20] srcu: Fix long lines in cleanup_srcu_struct() Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 19/20] srcu: Fix long lines in srcu_gp_end() Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 22:47 ` [PATCH rcu 20/20] srcu: Fix long lines in srcu_funnel_gp_start() Paul E. McKenney
2023-04-04 13:57 ` [PATCH rcu 0/20] Further shrink srcu_struct to promote cache locality Joel Fernandes
2023-04-04 14:09   ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-04-04 17:01     ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-04 17:17       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230330224726.662344-14-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sachinp@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox