public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, "Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	"Lu Baolu" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org
Cc: "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Zanussi, Tom" <tom.zanussi@intel.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove PASID supervisor request support
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 16:11:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230331231137.1947675-3-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230331231137.1947675-1-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>

There's no more usage,  remove PASID supervisor support.

Suggested-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 43 -------------------------------------
 drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h |  7 ------
 2 files changed, 50 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
index 633e0a4a01e7..c5d479770e12 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
@@ -335,15 +335,6 @@ static inline void pasid_set_fault_enable(struct pasid_entry *pe)
 	pasid_set_bits(&pe->val[0], 1 << 1, 0);
 }
 
-/*
- * Setup the SRE(Supervisor Request Enable) field (Bit 128) of a
- * scalable mode PASID entry.
- */
-static inline void pasid_set_sre(struct pasid_entry *pe)
-{
-	pasid_set_bits(&pe->val[2], 1 << 0, 1);
-}
-
 /*
  * Setup the WPE(Write Protect Enable) field (Bit 132) of a
  * scalable mode PASID entry.
@@ -521,23 +512,6 @@ int intel_pasid_setup_first_level(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if (flags & PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86
-		unsigned long cr0 = read_cr0();
-
-		/* CR0.WP is normally set but just to be sure */
-		if (unlikely(!(cr0 & X86_CR0_WP))) {
-			pr_err("No CPU write protect!\n");
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-#endif
-		if (!ecap_srs(iommu->ecap)) {
-			pr_err("No supervisor request support on %s\n",
-			       iommu->name);
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-	}
-
 	if ((flags & PASID_FLAG_FL5LP) && !cap_fl5lp_support(iommu->cap)) {
 		pr_err("No 5-level paging support for first-level on %s\n",
 		       iommu->name);
@@ -560,10 +534,6 @@ int intel_pasid_setup_first_level(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
 
 	/* Setup the first level page table pointer: */
 	pasid_set_flptr(pte, (u64)__pa(pgd));
-	if (flags & PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE) {
-		pasid_set_sre(pte);
-		pasid_set_wpe(pte);
-	}
 
 	if (flags & PASID_FLAG_FL5LP)
 		pasid_set_flpm(pte, 1);
@@ -658,12 +628,6 @@ int intel_pasid_setup_second_level(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
 	pasid_set_fault_enable(pte);
 	pasid_set_page_snoop(pte, !!ecap_smpwc(iommu->ecap));
 
-	/*
-	 * Since it is a second level only translation setup, we should
-	 * set SRE bit as well (addresses are expected to be GPAs).
-	 */
-	if (pasid != PASID_RID2PASID && ecap_srs(iommu->ecap))
-		pasid_set_sre(pte);
 	pasid_set_present(pte);
 	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
 
@@ -700,13 +664,6 @@ int intel_pasid_setup_pass_through(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
 	pasid_set_translation_type(pte, PASID_ENTRY_PGTT_PT);
 	pasid_set_fault_enable(pte);
 	pasid_set_page_snoop(pte, !!ecap_smpwc(iommu->ecap));
-
-	/*
-	 * We should set SRE bit as well since the addresses are expected
-	 * to be GPAs.
-	 */
-	if (ecap_srs(iommu->ecap))
-		pasid_set_sre(pte);
 	pasid_set_present(pte);
 	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
 
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h
index 20c54e50f533..d6b7d21244b1 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h
@@ -41,13 +41,6 @@
 #define FLPT_DEFAULT_DID		1
 #define NUM_RESERVED_DID		2
 
-/*
- * The SUPERVISOR_MODE flag indicates a first level translation which
- * can be used for access to kernel addresses. It is valid only for
- * access to the kernel's static 1:1 mapping of physical memory — not
- * to vmalloc or even module mappings.
- */
-#define PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE	BIT(0)
 #define PASID_FLAG_NESTED		BIT(1)
 #define PASID_FLAG_PAGE_SNOOP		BIT(2)
 
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-31 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-31 23:11 [PATCH v3 0/7] Re-enable IDXD kernel workqueue under DMA API Jacob Pan
2023-03-31 23:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] iommu/vt-d: Use non-privileged mode for all PASIDs Jacob Pan
2023-04-01 13:41   ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-31 23:11 ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2023-03-31 23:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] iommu/sva: Support allocation of global PASIDs outside SVA Jacob Pan
2023-04-01 13:16   ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-03 20:44     ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-01 13:28   ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-03 20:55     ` Jacob Pan
2023-03-31 23:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Reserve RID_PASID from global PASID space Jacob Pan
2023-04-01 13:43   ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-03 21:40     ` Jacob Pan
2023-03-31 23:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Make device pasid attachment explicit Jacob Pan
2023-03-31 23:11 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Implement set_dev_pasid domain op Jacob Pan
2023-04-01 13:48   ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-03 21:48     ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-04  5:24       ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-31 23:11 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] dmaengine/idxd: Re-enable kernel workqueue under DMA API Jacob Pan
2023-03-31 23:31   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-04-03 21:56     ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-01 13:39   ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-03 21:54     ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-05 12:15   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-04-06  2:49     ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-06 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Re-enable IDXD " Baolu Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230331231137.1947675-3-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=tom.zanussi@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox