public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/ds: Use the size from each PEBS record
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 15:13:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230406131351.GL386572@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230328222735.1367829-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 03:27:35PM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The kernel warning for the unexpected PEBS record can also be observed
> during a context switch, when the below commands are running in parallel
> for a while on SPR.
> 
>   while true; do perf record --no-buildid -a --intr-regs=AX -e
>   cpu/event=0xd0,umask=0x81/pp -c 10003 -o /dev/null ./triad; done &
> 
>   while true; do perf record -o /tmp/out -W -d -e
>   '{ld_blocks.store_forward:period=1000000,
>   MEM_TRANS_RETIRED.LOAD_LATENCY:u:precise=2:ldlat=4}'
>   -c 1037 ./triad; done
>   *The triad program is just the generation of loads/stores.
> 
> The current PEBS code assumes that all the PEBS records in the DS buffer
> have the same size, aka cpuc->pebs_record_size. It's true for the most
> cases, since the DS buffer is always flushed in every context switch.
> 
> However, there is a corner case that breaks the assumption.
> A system-wide PEBS event with the large PEBS config may be enabled
> during a context switch. Some PEBS records for the system-wide PEBS may
> be generated while the old task is sched out but the new one hasn't been
> sched in yet. When the new task is sched in, the cpuc->pebs_record_size
> may be updated for the per-task PEBS events. So the existing system-wide
> PEBS records have a different size from the later PEBS records.
> 
> Two methods were considered to fix the issue.
> One is to flush the DS buffer for the system-wide PEBS right before the
> new task sched in. It has to be done in the generic code via the
> sched_task() call back. However, the sched_task() is shared among
> different ARCHs. The movement may impact other ARCHs, e.g., AMD BRS
> requires the sched_task() is called after the PMU has started on a
> ctxswin. The method is dropped.
> 
> The other method is implemented here. It doesn't assume that all the
> PEBS records have the same size any more. The size from each PEBS record
> is used to parse the record. For the previous platform (PEBS format < 4),
> which doesn't support adaptive PEBS, there is nothing changed.

Same as with the other; why can't we flush the buffer when we reprogram
the hardware?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-06 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-28 22:27 [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add sched_task callback during ctx reschedule kan.liang
2023-03-28 22:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/ds: Use the size from each PEBS record kan.liang
2023-03-29  0:34   ` kernel test robot
2023-03-29  2:58   ` kernel test robot
2023-04-06 13:13   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-04-06 15:36     ` Liang, Kan
2023-04-06 13:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add sched_task callback during ctx reschedule Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230406131351.GL386572@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox