* [PATCH v1] swiotlb: fix a braino in the alignment check fix
@ 2023-04-06 14:35 Petr Tesarik
2023-04-06 14:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Petr Tesarik @ 2023-04-06 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig, Marek Szyprowski, Robin Murphy, Petr Tesarik,
open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS, open list
Cc: Roberto Sassu, petr
From: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@huawei.com>
The alignment mask in swiotlb_do_find_slots() masks off the high
bits which are not relevant for the alignment, so multiple
requirements are combined with a bitwise OR rather than AND.
In plain English, the stricter the alignment, the more bits must
be set in iotlb_align_mask.
Confusion may arise from the fact that the same variable is also
used to mask off the offset within a swiotlb slot, which is
achieved with a bitwise AND.
Fixes: 0eee5ae10256 ("swiotlb: fix slot alignment checks")
Reported-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAA42JLa1y9jJ7BgQvXeUYQh-K2mDNHd2BYZ4iZUz33r5zY7oAQ@mail.gmail.com/
Reported-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230405003549.GA21326@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net/
Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
---
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 5b919ef832b6..dac42a2ad588 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static int swiotlb_do_find_slots(struct device *dev, int area_index,
phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, mem->start) & boundary_mask;
unsigned long max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
unsigned int iotlb_align_mask =
- dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) & ~(IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
+ dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) | alloc_align_mask;
unsigned int nslots = nr_slots(alloc_size), stride;
unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(dev, orig_addr);
unsigned int index, slots_checked, count = 0, i;
@@ -639,8 +639,8 @@ static int swiotlb_do_find_slots(struct device *dev, int area_index,
* allocations.
*/
if (alloc_size >= PAGE_SIZE)
- iotlb_align_mask &= PAGE_MASK;
- iotlb_align_mask &= alloc_align_mask;
+ iotlb_align_mask |= ~PAGE_MASK;
+ iotlb_align_mask &= ~(IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
/*
* For mappings with an alignment requirement don't bother looping to
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] swiotlb: fix a braino in the alignment check fix
2023-04-06 14:35 [PATCH v1] swiotlb: fix a braino in the alignment check fix Petr Tesarik
@ 2023-04-06 14:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2023-04-06 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Petr Tesarik
Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Marek Szyprowski, Robin Murphy, Petr Tesarik,
open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS, open list, Roberto Sassu, petr
Thanks,
applied to the dma-mapping tree for 6.3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-06 14:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-06 14:35 [PATCH v1] swiotlb: fix a braino in the alignment check fix Petr Tesarik
2023-04-06 14:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox