From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Natu, Mahesh" <mahesh.natu@intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/EDR: Clear PCIe Device Status errors after EDR error recovery
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 17:21:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230406222135.GA3743643@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4803e7e-bbfe-8925-88e9-935775960e63@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 02:52:02PM -0700, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
> On 4/6/23 2:07 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 04:54:49PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> >> Commit 068c29a248b6 ("PCI/ERR: Clear PCIe Device Status errors only if
> >> OS owns AER") adds support to clear error status in the Device Status
> >> Register(DEVSTA) only if OS owns the AER support. But this change
> >> breaks the requirement of the EDR feature which requires OS to cleanup
> >> the error registers even if firmware owns the control of AER support.
> >>
> >> More details about this requirement can be found in PCIe Firmware
> >> specification v3.3, Table 4-6 Interpretation of the _OSC Control Field.
> >> If the OS supports the Error Disconnect Recover (EDR) feature and
> >> firmware sends the EDR event, then during the EDR recovery window, OS
> >> is responsible for the device error recovery and holds the ownership of
> >> the following error registers.
> >>
> >> • Device Status Register
> >> • Uncorrectable Error Status Register
> >> • Correctable Error Status Register
> >> • Root Error Status Register
> >> • RP PIO Status Register
> >>
> >> So call pcie_clear_device_status() in edr_handle_event() if the error
> >> recovery is successful.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Tsaur Erwin <erwin.tsaur@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes since v1:
> >> * Rebased on top of v6.3-rc1.
> >> * Fixed a typo in pcie_clear_device_status().
> >>
> >> drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c
> >> index a6b9b479b97a..87734e4c3c20 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c
> >> @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ static void edr_handle_event(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
> >> */
> >> if (estate == PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
> >> pci_dbg(edev, "DPC port successfully recovered\n");
> >> + pcie_clear_device_status(edev);
> >> acpi_send_edr_status(pdev, edev, EDR_OST_SUCCESS);
> >
> > The implementation note in PCI Firmware r3.3, sec 4.6.12, shows the OS
> > clearing error status *after* _OST is evaluated.
> >
> > On the other hand, the _OSC DPC control bit in table 4-6 says that if
> > the OS does not have DPC control, it can only write the Device Status
> > error bits between the EDR Notify and invoking _OST.
> >
> > Is one of those wrong, or am I missing something?
>
> Agree. It is conflicting info. IMO, the argument that the OS is allowed to
> clear the error registers during the EDR windows makes more sense. If OS
> is allowed to touch error registers owned by firmware after that window,
> it would lead to race conditions.
>
> Mahesh, let us know your comments. Maybe we need to fix this in the firmware
> specification.
My assumption was this sequence is something like this, where firmware
*can't* collect error status from devices below the Downstream Port
because DPC has been triggered and they are not accessible:
- Hardware triggers DPC in a Downstream Port
- Firmware fields error interrupt
- Firmware captures Downstream Port error info (devices below are
not accessible because of DPC)
- Firmware sends EDR Notify to OS
- OS brings Downstream Port out of DPC
- OS collects error status from devices below Downstream Port
- OS evaluates _OST
- Firmware captures error status from devices below Downstream Port
But that doesn't explain why *firmware* could not clear the error
status of those devices after it captures it.
I guess the flowchart *does* show firmware clearing the error status
in the "do not continue recovery" path.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-15 23:54 [PATCH v2] PCI/EDR: Clear PCIe Device Status errors after EDR error recovery Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2023-03-24 17:53 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-03-29 22:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-29 22:38 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-03-30 15:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-31 6:46 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-03-31 15:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-06 21:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-06 21:52 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-04-06 22:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2023-04-06 22:46 ` Natu, Mahesh
2023-04-07 5:31 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-04-07 16:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-07 22:19 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-04-07 22:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-07 21:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-07 21:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-07 22:25 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-04-07 22:21 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230406222135.GA3743643@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahesh.natu@intel.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox