Re: [PATCH] Revert "dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add iommu-map properties"

[Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>]

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:46:33PM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 03:41:12PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 10:15:53AM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:12:31AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 12:47:42PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:45:33PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > > > This reverts commit 6ebfa40b63ae65eac20834ef4f45355fc5ef6899.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > "iommu-map" property is already documented in commit
> > > > > 
> > > > > Need the commit hash here.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > ("dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add SM8550 compatible") along with the "iommus"
> > > > > > property.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Shouldn't there be a patch removing "iommus" as discussed?
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Yeah, that was my intention after the dts patches were merged. And since the
> > > > dts patches are in linux-next now, I could finally send the patch.
> > > 
> > > I don't understand what's the plan here. By the way, instead of merging
> > > this revert I just dropped the commit that this patch is reverting from
> > > the controller/qcom branch, please have a look to check if everything is
> > > what you expect it to be there.
> > > 
> > 
> > This is fine. The plan is to remove the "iommus" property from Qcom PCI binding
> > since we have removed the usage of that property from devicetree [1]. Initially
> > the iommu properties were not documented at all in the binding. But commit,
> > "dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add SM8550 compatible" added them to the binding to
> > satisfy dtbs check. But in parallel, the patch removing "iommus" property from
> > dts got merged to qcom tree.
> > 
> > So now we have 2 options here:
> > 
> > 1. Amend the commit "dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add SM8550 compatible" to remove
> > the "iommus" property.
> > 
> > 2. I will submit a separate patch removing that property.
> > 
> > Lorenzo, let me know what works for you. Sorry for the mess! Confusion happened
> > due to patches getting applied without sync.
> 
> You can inline a diff here for (1), I will amend the commit.
> 

Here you go:

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
index a1318a4ecadf..1548a7114732 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
@@ -60,9 +60,6 @@ properties:
     minItems: 1
     maxItems: 8
 
-  iommus:
-    maxItems: 1
-
   iommu-map:
     maxItems: 2
 

- Mani

> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
> 
> > - Mani
> > 
> > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=6340b391e15094575911ab0d96bfff09deadafba
> > 
> > > Lorenzo
> > > 
> > > > - Mani
> > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > So let's revert the commit that just added "iommu-map" to avoid
> > > > > > duplication.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml | 2 --
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
> > > > > > index 5d236bac99b6..a1318a4ecadf 100644
> > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
> > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
> > > > > > @@ -78,8 +78,6 @@ properties:
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >    dma-coherent: true
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > -  iommu-map: true
> > > > > > -
> > > > > >    interconnects:
> > > > > >      maxItems: 2
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
> > 
> > -- 
> > மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்