From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92929C77B6E for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229713AbjDNFZG (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Apr 2023 01:25:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50520 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229540AbjDNFZC (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Apr 2023 01:25:02 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 352D11B3; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 22:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id C1D2368AA6; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 07:24:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 07:24:58 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: kernel test robot Cc: Christoph Hellwig , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba , Johannes Thumshirn , Anand Jain , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com Subject: Re: [linus:master] [btrfs] 4ae2edf12d: fio.write_iops -11.9% regression Message-ID: <20230414052458.GA11616@lst.de> References: <202304140917.9e9f5c1-yujie.liu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202304140917.9e9f5c1-yujie.liu@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:01:51AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > Hello, > > kernel test robot noticed a -11.9% regression of fio.write_iops on: > > commit: 4ae2edf12d49fdbaea2dfda0bb2ec06501bd3493 ("btrfs: simplify parameters of btrfs_lookup_bio_sums") > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master Can you revalidate this? The patch is purely a parameter passing cleanup, so a large reduction in IOPS looks very suspicious.