From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] perf/x86/intel/ds: Flush the PEBS buffer in PEBS enable
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:29:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230414102908.GC83892@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230410181309.827175-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:13:09AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> index 3a77f4336df7..4639d4c1e98d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> @@ -1257,20 +1257,18 @@ pebs_update_state(bool needed_cb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
> if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_baseline && add) {
> u64 pebs_data_cfg;
>
> - /* Clear pebs_data_cfg and pebs_record_size for first PEBS. */
> - if (cpuc->n_pebs == 1) {
> + /* Clear pebs_data_cfg for first PEBS. */
> + if (cpuc->n_pebs == 1)
> cpuc->pebs_data_cfg = 0;
> - cpuc->pebs_record_size = sizeof(struct pebs_basic);
> - }
>
> pebs_data_cfg = pebs_update_adaptive_cfg(event);
>
> - /* Update pebs_record_size if new event requires more data. */
> - if (pebs_data_cfg & ~cpuc->pebs_data_cfg) {
> + /*
> + * Only update the pebs_data_cfg here. The pebs_record_size
> + * will be updated later when the new pebs_data_cfg takes effect.
> + */
> + if (pebs_data_cfg & ~cpuc->pebs_data_cfg)
> cpuc->pebs_data_cfg |= pebs_data_cfg;
> - adaptive_pebs_record_size_update();
> - update = true;
> - }
> }
>
> if (update)
pebs_update_threshold(cpuc);
Now, pebs_update_threshold() will actually use
->pebs_record_size, but afaict the above now has a path through (for
example for the first event) where update is true but ->pebs_record_size
is unset/stale.
I think it all works out, but it is quite a mess and hard to follow.
> @@ -1331,6 +1329,13 @@ static void intel_pmu_pebs_via_pt_enable(struct perf_event *event)
> wrmsrl(base + idx, value);
> }
>
> +static inline void intel_pmu_drain_large_pebs(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
> +{
> + if (cpuc->n_pebs == cpuc->n_large_pebs &&
> + cpuc->n_pebs != cpuc->n_pebs_via_pt)
> + intel_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer();
> +}
Its been a minute since I looked at this code; but why only for large
pebs? Surely flushing is quick when the DS is actually empty and that
stops us having to worry if there's races where there might be a single
entry in.
> void intel_pmu_pebs_enable(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> @@ -1350,6 +1355,18 @@ void intel_pmu_pebs_enable(struct perf_event *event)
> if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_baseline) {
> hwc->config |= ICL_EVENTSEL_ADAPTIVE;
> if (cpuc->pebs_data_cfg != cpuc->active_pebs_data_cfg) {
> + /*
> + * A system-wide PEBS event with the large PEBS
> + * config may still be enabled when switching the
> + * context. Some PEBS records for the system-wide
> + * PEBS may be generated while the old event has
> + * been scheduled out but the new one hasn't been
> + * scheduled in. It's not enough to only flush the
> + * buffer when a PEBS event is disable.
> + */
Perhaps just:
/*
* drain_pebs() assumes uniform record size;
* hence we need to drain when changing said
* size.
*/
> + intel_pmu_drain_large_pebs(cpuc);
> + adaptive_pebs_record_size_update();
> + pebs_update_threshold(cpuc);
> wrmsrl(MSR_PEBS_DATA_CFG, cpuc->pebs_data_cfg);
> cpuc->active_pebs_data_cfg = cpuc->pebs_data_cfg;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-14 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-10 18:13 [PATCH V3] perf/x86/intel/ds: Flush the PEBS buffer in PEBS enable kan.liang
2023-04-14 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-04-14 14:22 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230414102908.GC83892@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox