public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] perf/x86/intel/ds: Flush the PEBS buffer in PEBS enable
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:29:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230414102908.GC83892@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230410181309.827175-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:13:09AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:

>  arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> index 3a77f4336df7..4639d4c1e98d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> @@ -1257,20 +1257,18 @@ pebs_update_state(bool needed_cb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
>  	if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_baseline && add) {
>  		u64 pebs_data_cfg;
>  
> -		/* Clear pebs_data_cfg and pebs_record_size for first PEBS. */
> -		if (cpuc->n_pebs == 1) {
> +		/* Clear pebs_data_cfg for first PEBS. */
> +		if (cpuc->n_pebs == 1)
>  			cpuc->pebs_data_cfg = 0;
> -			cpuc->pebs_record_size = sizeof(struct pebs_basic);
> -		}
>  
>  		pebs_data_cfg = pebs_update_adaptive_cfg(event);
>  
> -		/* Update pebs_record_size if new event requires more data. */
> -		if (pebs_data_cfg & ~cpuc->pebs_data_cfg) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Only update the pebs_data_cfg here. The pebs_record_size
> +		 * will be updated later when the new pebs_data_cfg takes effect.
> +		 */
> +		if (pebs_data_cfg & ~cpuc->pebs_data_cfg)
>  			cpuc->pebs_data_cfg |= pebs_data_cfg;
> -			adaptive_pebs_record_size_update();
> -			update = true;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (update)
		pebs_update_threshold(cpuc);

Now, pebs_update_threshold() will actually use
->pebs_record_size, but afaict the above now has a path through (for
example for the first event) where update is true but ->pebs_record_size
is unset/stale.

I think it all works out, but it is quite a mess and hard to follow.

> @@ -1331,6 +1329,13 @@ static void intel_pmu_pebs_via_pt_enable(struct perf_event *event)
>  	wrmsrl(base + idx, value);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void intel_pmu_drain_large_pebs(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
> +{
> +	if (cpuc->n_pebs == cpuc->n_large_pebs &&
> +	    cpuc->n_pebs != cpuc->n_pebs_via_pt)
> +		intel_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer();
> +}

Its been a minute since I looked at this code; but why only for large
pebs? Surely flushing is quick when the DS is actually empty and that
stops us having to worry if there's races where there might be a single
entry in.

>  void intel_pmu_pebs_enable(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
>  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> @@ -1350,6 +1355,18 @@ void intel_pmu_pebs_enable(struct perf_event *event)
>  	if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_baseline) {
>  		hwc->config |= ICL_EVENTSEL_ADAPTIVE;
>  		if (cpuc->pebs_data_cfg != cpuc->active_pebs_data_cfg) {
> +			/*
> +			 * A system-wide PEBS event with the large PEBS
> +			 * config may still be enabled when switching the
> +			 * context. Some PEBS records for the system-wide
> +			 * PEBS may be generated while the old event has
> +			 * been scheduled out but the new one hasn't been
> +			 * scheduled in. It's not enough to only flush the
> +			 * buffer when a PEBS event is disable.
> +			 */

Perhaps just:

			/*
			 * drain_pebs() assumes uniform record size;
			 * hence we need to drain when changing said
			 * size.
			 */


> +			intel_pmu_drain_large_pebs(cpuc);
> +			adaptive_pebs_record_size_update();
> +			pebs_update_threshold(cpuc);
>  			wrmsrl(MSR_PEBS_DATA_CFG, cpuc->pebs_data_cfg);
>  			cpuc->active_pebs_data_cfg = cpuc->pebs_data_cfg;
>  		}

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-14 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-10 18:13 [PATCH V3] perf/x86/intel/ds: Flush the PEBS buffer in PEBS enable kan.liang
2023-04-14 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-04-14 14:22   ` Liang, Kan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230414102908.GC83892@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox