public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Rajat Khandelwal <rajat.khandelwal@linux.intel.com>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: typec: intel_pmc_mux: Expose IOM port status to debugfs
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 12:18:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023041859-humpback-thespian-e28c@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20cc057d-6b2b-5fc1-524f-c2c579c96a6b@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 03:10:47PM +0530, Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 4/17/2023 11:42 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:28:18AM +0530, Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On 4/15/2023 11:01 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 01:49:10PM +0530, Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
> > > > > IOM status has a crucial role during debugging to check the
> > > > > current state of the type-C port.
> > > > > There are ways to fetch the status, but all those require the
> > > > > IOM port status offset, which could change with platform.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Make a debugfs directory for intel_pmc_mux and expose the status
> > > > > under it per port basis.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Rajat Khandelwal <rajat.khandelwal@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > > v2:
> > > > > 1. Remove static declaration of the debugfs root for 'intel_pmc_mux'
> > > > > 2. Remove explicitly defined one-liner functions
> > > > > 
> > > > >    drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >    1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c b/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c
> > > > > index 34e4188a40ff..1d43b111781e 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c
> > > > > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> > > > >    #include <linux/usb/typec_mux.h>
> > > > >    #include <linux/usb/typec_dp.h>
> > > > >    #include <linux/usb/typec_tbt.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> > > > >    #include <asm/intel_scu_ipc.h>
> > > > > @@ -639,9 +640,34 @@ static int pmc_usb_probe_iom(struct pmc_usb *pmc)
> > > > >    	return 0;
> > > > >    }
> > > > > +static int port_iom_status_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	struct pmc_usb_port *port = s->private;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	update_port_status(port);
> > > > > +	seq_printf(s, "0x%08x\n", port->iom_status);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	return 0;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(port_iom_status);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static void pmc_mux_port_debugfs_init(struct pmc_usb_port *port,
> > > > > +				      struct dentry *pmc_mux_debugfs_root)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	struct dentry *debugfs_dir;
> > > > > +	char name[6];
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "port%d", port->usb3_port - 1);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(name, pmc_mux_debugfs_root);
> > > > > +	debugfs_create_file("iom_status", 0400, debugfs_dir, port,
> > > > > +			    &port_iom_status_fops);
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >    static int pmc_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > >    {
> > > > >    	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = NULL;
> > > > > +	struct dentry *pmc_mux_debugfs_root;
> > > > >    	struct pmc_usb *pmc;
> > > > >    	int i = 0;
> > > > >    	int ret;
> > > > > @@ -674,6 +700,8 @@ static int pmc_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > >    	if (ret)
> > > > >    		return ret;
> > > > > +	pmc_mux_debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir("intel_pmc_mux", NULL);
> > > > What happens when you have more than one device in the system at the
> > > > same time?
> > > I'm sorry I didn't understand the question. We would have separate directories
> > > for all the ports which would contain the 'iom_status' file, thus representing
> > > status for all the ports individually.
> > > Can you rephrase the question since I guess you had something else in mind?
> > Can you please show the output of the directory
> > /sys/kernel/debug/intel_pmc_mux/ with multiple pmc devices in the system
> > at the same time?
> 
> Sorry, I don't own a system with multiple PMCs. Anyways, do we even have
> a system with such design?

You might tomorrow.  So please don't create problems like this when you
do not have to.

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-18 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-14  8:19 [PATCH v2] usb: typec: intel_pmc_mux: Expose IOM port status to debugfs Rajat Khandelwal
2023-04-15  5:31 ` Greg KH
2023-04-17  5:58   ` Rajat Khandelwal
2023-04-17  6:12     ` Greg KH
2023-04-18  9:40       ` Rajat Khandelwal
2023-04-18 10:18         ` Greg KH [this message]
2023-04-18 10:23           ` Rajat Khandelwal
2023-04-18 10:37             ` Heikki Krogerus
2023-04-18 10:40             ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2023041859-humpback-thespian-e28c@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rajat.khandelwal@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox