public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lance@osuosl.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:53:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230425115313.GD1335080@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEXW_YRFZ3zDc0gJRHjJPRuNaBtnmUc+9RxSAHH48jkFw_b34g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 06:59:29AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > I'm a little confused; the way I understand the whole stack protector
> > thing to work is that we push a canary on the stack at call and on
> > return check it is still valid. Since in general tasks randomly migrate,
> > the per-cpu validation canary should be the same on all CPUs.

> AFAICS, the canary is randomly chosen both in the kernel [1]. This

Yes, at boot, once. But thereafter it should be the same for all CPUs.

> also appears to be the case in glibc. That makes sense because you
> don't want the canary to be something that the attacker can easily
> predict and store on the stack to bypass buffer overflow attacks:
> 
> [1] kernel :
> /*
>  * Initialize the stackprotector canary value.
>  *
>  * NOTE: this must only be called from functions that never return,
>  * and it must always be inlined.
>  */
> static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
> {
>         unsigned long canary = get_random_canary();
> 
>         current->stack_canary = canary;
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>         get_paca()->canary = canary;
> #endif
> }
> 
> thanks,
> 
>  - Joel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-25 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-22 12:46 BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-22 19:19 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-23  1:37   ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-23  5:45     ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-22 19:28 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-24  0:32   ` Boqun Feng
2023-04-24  4:00     ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-24 13:14     ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-24 15:13       ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-04-24 15:28         ` Boqun Feng
2023-04-24 17:29           ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-04-24 19:25             ` Boqun Feng
2023-04-24 18:55           ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-25 10:13             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-25 10:58               ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-25 11:06                 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-25  3:12                   ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-25 13:40                   ` Christophe Leroy
2023-04-25 13:49                     ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-26  0:32                       ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-26  1:31                         ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-26  2:15                           ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-26  2:37                             ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-26  0:42                     ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-26 12:29                   ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-26 13:44                     ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-26 14:20                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-26 14:45                         ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-28 10:35                     ` Christophe Leroy
2023-04-25 10:59               ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-25 11:53                 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-04-25 13:36                   ` Christophe Leroy
2023-04-24 22:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-24 22:13   ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-25  6:01   ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-25  9:27     ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-27  3:09       ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-27  3:32         ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-27  9:21         ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-27 14:13           ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-27 14:29             ` Zhouyi Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230425115313.GD1335080@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=lance@osuosl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=zhouzhouyi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox