From: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] kmemleak-test: drop __init to get better backtrace
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:24:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230425222446.170486-4-jim.cromie@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230425222446.170486-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Drop the __init on kmemleak_test_init(). With it, the storage is
reclaimed, but then the symbol isn't available for "%pS" rendering,
and the backtrace gets a bare pointer where the actual leak happened.
unreferenced object 0xffff88800a2b0800 (size 1024):
comm "modprobe", pid 413, jiffies 4294953430
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
73 02 00 00 75 01 00 68 02 00 00 01 00 00 00 04 s...u..h........
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace (ck 603070071):
[<00000000fabad728>] kmalloc_trace+0x26/0x90
[<00000000ef738764>] 0xffffffffc02350a2
[<00000000004e5795>] do_one_initcall+0x43/0x210
[<00000000d768905e>] do_init_module+0x4a/0x210
[<0000000087135ab5>] __do_sys_finit_module+0x93/0xf0
[<000000004fcb1fa2>] do_syscall_64+0x34/0x80
[<00000000c73c8d9d>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
with __init gone, that trace entry renders like:
[<00000000ef738764>] kmemleak_test_init+<offset>/<size>
---
samples/kmemleak/kmemleak-test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/samples/kmemleak/kmemleak-test.c b/samples/kmemleak/kmemleak-test.c
index 7b476eb8285f..6ced5ddd99d4 100644
--- a/samples/kmemleak/kmemleak-test.c
+++ b/samples/kmemleak/kmemleak-test.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, kmemleak_test_pointer);
* Some very simple testing. This function needs to be extended for
* proper testing.
*/
-static int __init kmemleak_test_init(void)
+static int kmemleak_test_init(void)
{
struct test_node *elem;
int i;
--
2.40.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-25 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-25 22:24 [PATCH 0/3] kmemleak report format changes Jim Cromie
2023-04-25 22:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] kmemleak: drop (age <increasing>) from leak record Jim Cromie
2023-04-25 22:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] kmemleak: add checksum to backtrace report Jim Cromie
2023-04-25 22:24 ` Jim Cromie [this message]
2023-04-28 17:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] kmemleak-test: drop __init to get better backtrace Catalin Marinas
2023-04-28 17:25 ` [PATCH 0/3] kmemleak report format changes Catalin Marinas
2023-11-11 0:19 ` jim.cromie
2023-11-16 17:56 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230425222446.170486-4-jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--to=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox