public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: sangsup lee <k1rh4.lee@gmail.com>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	Amol Maheshwari <amahesh@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] misc: fastrpc: Fix a Use after-free-bug by race condition
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:52:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023042702-shuffling-tweet-d9f6@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJkuJRjFCXkS+osc8ezpAw0E2W7WMAJnnxMt_cs4deqgm5OzHw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 06:29:16PM +0900, sangsup lee wrote:
> Is there any comment for this issue?

What issue?

> (reference: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4731408.html)

Please use lore.kernel.org links, we have no control over any other
random email archive .

And the above link just points to this proposed patch.

> 
> 
> 2023년 3월 23일 (목) 오전 10:37, Sangsup Lee <k1rh4.lee@gmail.com>님이 작성:
> >
> > From: Sangsup lee <k1rh4.lee@gmail.com>
> >
> > This patch adds mutex_lock for fixing an Use-after-free bug.
> > fastrpc_req_munmap_impl can be called concurrently in multi-threded environments.
> > The buf which is allocated by list_for_each_safe can be used after another thread frees it.

How was this tested?

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sangsup lee <k1rh4.lee@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  V1 -> V2: moving the locking to ioctl.
> >
> >  drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> > index 93ebd174d848..aa1cf0e9f4ed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> > @@ -1901,7 +1901,9 @@ static long fastrpc_device_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> >                 err = fastrpc_req_mmap(fl, argp);
> >                 break;
> >         case FASTRPC_IOCTL_MUNMAP:
> > +               mutex_lock(&fl->mutex);
> >                 err = fastrpc_req_munmap(fl, argp);
> > +               mutex_unlock(&fl->mutex);

Are you sure you can call this function with the lock?  If so, why isn't
the mmap ioctl also locked?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-27  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-23  1:36 [PATCH v2] misc: fastrpc: Fix a Use after-free-bug by race condition Sangsup Lee
2023-04-27  9:29 ` sangsup lee
2023-04-27  9:52   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2023-04-27 11:51     ` sangsup lee
2023-04-27 12:27       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-04-28  5:00     ` sangsup lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2023042702-shuffling-tweet-d9f6@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=amahesh@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=k1rh4.lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox