[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.3 1/3] refscale: Move shutdown from wait_event() to wait_event_idle()

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.3 1/3] refscale: Move shutdown from wait_event() to wait_event_idle()

[Sasha Levin]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 6bc6e6b27524304aadb9c04611ddb1c84dd7617a ]

The ref_scale_shutdown() kthread/function uses wait_event() to wait for
the refscale test to complete.  However, although the read-side tests
are normally extremely fast, there is no law against specifying a very
large value for the refscale.loops module parameter or against having
a slow read-side primitive.  Either way, this might well trigger the
hung-task timeout.

This commit therefore replaces those wait_event() calls with calls to
wait_event_idle(), which do not trigger the hung-task timeout.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/refscale.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
index afa3e1a2f6902..1970ce5f22d40 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
@@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ ref_scale_cleanup(void)
 static int
 ref_scale_shutdown(void *arg)
 {
-	wait_event(shutdown_wq, shutdown_start);
+	wait_event_idle(shutdown_wq, shutdown_start);
 
 	smp_mb(); // Wake before output.
 	ref_scale_cleanup();
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.3 2/3] selftests: cgroup: Add 'malloc' failures checks in test_memcontrol

[Sasha Levin]

From: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit c83f320e55a49abd90629f42a72897afd579e0de ]

There are several 'malloc' calls in test_memcontrol, which can be
unsuccessful. This patch will add 'malloc' failures checking to
give more details about test's fail reasons and avoid possible
undefined behavior during the future null dereference (like the
one in alloc_anon_50M_check_swap function).

Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
index 1e616a8c6a9cf..f4f7c0aef702b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
@@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ static int alloc_anon_50M_check(const char *cgroup, void *arg)
 	int ret = -1;
 
 	buf = malloc(size);
+	if (buf == NULL) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "malloc() failed\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	for (ptr = buf; ptr < buf + size; ptr += PAGE_SIZE)
 		*ptr = 0;
 
@@ -211,6 +216,11 @@ static int alloc_anon_noexit(const char *cgroup, void *arg)
 	char *buf, *ptr;
 
 	buf = malloc(size);
+	if (buf == NULL) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "malloc() failed\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	for (ptr = buf; ptr < buf + size; ptr += PAGE_SIZE)
 		*ptr = 0;
 
@@ -778,6 +788,11 @@ static int alloc_anon_50M_check_swap(const char *cgroup, void *arg)
 	int ret = -1;
 
 	buf = malloc(size);
+	if (buf == NULL) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "malloc() failed\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	for (ptr = buf; ptr < buf + size; ptr += PAGE_SIZE)
 		*ptr = 0;
 
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.3 3/3] rcu: Protect rcu_print_task_exp_stall() ->exp_tasks access

[Sasha Levin]

From: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 3c1566bca3f8349f12b75d0a2d5e4a20ad6262ec ]

For kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y, the following scenario can
result in a NULL-pointer dereference:

           CPU1                                           CPU2
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore                rcu_print_task_exp_stall
  if (special.b.blocked)                            READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks) != NULL
    raw_spin_lock_rcu_node
    np = rcu_next_node_entry(t, rnp)
    if (&t->rcu_node_entry == rnp->exp_tasks)
      WRITE_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks, np)
      ....
      raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node
                                                    raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node
                                                    t = list_entry(rnp->exp_tasks->prev,
                                                        struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry)
                                                    (if rnp->exp_tasks is NULL, this
                                                       will dereference a NULL pointer)

The problem is that CPU2 accesses the rcu_node structure's->exp_tasks
field without holding the rcu_node structure's ->lock and CPU2 did
not observe CPU1's change to rcu_node structure's ->exp_tasks in time.
Therefore, if CPU1 sets rcu_node structure's->exp_tasks pointer to NULL,
then CPU2 might dereference that NULL pointer.

This commit therefore holds the rcu_node structure's ->lock while
accessing that structure's->exp_tasks field.

[ paulmck: Apply Frederic Weisbecker feedback. ]

Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 249c2967d9e6c..54e8fb258c98d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -802,9 +802,11 @@ static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 	int ndetected = 0;
 	struct task_struct *t;
 
-	if (!READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks))
-		return 0;
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+	if (!rnp->exp_tasks) {
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+		return 0;
+	}
 	t = list_entry(rnp->exp_tasks->prev,
 		       struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry);
 	list_for_each_entry_continue(t, &rnp->blkd_tasks, rcu_node_entry) {
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.3 1/3] refscale: Move shutdown from wait_event() to wait_event_idle()

[Sasha Levin]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 6bc6e6b27524304aadb9c04611ddb1c84dd7617a ]

The ref_scale_shutdown() kthread/function uses wait_event() to wait for
the refscale test to complete.  However, although the read-side tests
are normally extremely fast, there is no law against specifying a very
large value for the refscale.loops module parameter or against having
a slow read-side primitive.  Either way, this might well trigger the
hung-task timeout.

This commit therefore replaces those wait_event() calls with calls to
wait_event_idle(), which do not trigger the hung-task timeout.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/refscale.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
index afa3e1a2f6902..1970ce5f22d40 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
@@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ ref_scale_cleanup(void)
 static int
 ref_scale_shutdown(void *arg)
 {
-	wait_event(shutdown_wq, shutdown_start);
+	wait_event_idle(shutdown_wq, shutdown_start);
 
 	smp_mb(); // Wake before output.
 	ref_scale_cleanup();
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.3 3/3] rcu: Protect rcu_print_task_exp_stall() ->exp_tasks access

[Sasha Levin]

From: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 3c1566bca3f8349f12b75d0a2d5e4a20ad6262ec ]

For kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y, the following scenario can
result in a NULL-pointer dereference:

           CPU1                                           CPU2
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore                rcu_print_task_exp_stall
  if (special.b.blocked)                            READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks) != NULL
    raw_spin_lock_rcu_node
    np = rcu_next_node_entry(t, rnp)
    if (&t->rcu_node_entry == rnp->exp_tasks)
      WRITE_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks, np)
      ....
      raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node
                                                    raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node
                                                    t = list_entry(rnp->exp_tasks->prev,
                                                        struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry)
                                                    (if rnp->exp_tasks is NULL, this
                                                       will dereference a NULL pointer)

The problem is that CPU2 accesses the rcu_node structure's->exp_tasks
field without holding the rcu_node structure's ->lock and CPU2 did
not observe CPU1's change to rcu_node structure's ->exp_tasks in time.
Therefore, if CPU1 sets rcu_node structure's->exp_tasks pointer to NULL,
then CPU2 might dereference that NULL pointer.

This commit therefore holds the rcu_node structure's ->lock while
accessing that structure's->exp_tasks field.

[ paulmck: Apply Frederic Weisbecker feedback. ]

Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 249c2967d9e6c..54e8fb258c98d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -802,9 +802,11 @@ static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 	int ndetected = 0;
 	struct task_struct *t;
 
-	if (!READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks))
-		return 0;
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+	if (!rnp->exp_tasks) {
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+		return 0;
+	}
 	t = list_entry(rnp->exp_tasks->prev,
 		       struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry);
 	list_for_each_entry_continue(t, &rnp->blkd_tasks, rcu_node_entry) {
-- 
2.39.2