Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] x86/mtrr: fix handling with PAT but without MTRR

Borislav Petkov
2023-05-31T09:59:07Z

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 11:31:37AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> What it did would have been printed if pr_debug() would have been
> active. :-(

Lemme turn those into pr_info(). pr_debug() is nuts.

> Did you check whether CONFIG_MTRR_SANITIZER_ENABLE_DEFAULT was the same in both
> kernels you've tested?

Yes, it is enabled.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.