Re: [PATCH V3 6/6] PCI: qcom: Add support for IPQ9574

Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-05-02T08:35:10Z

On Tue, 2 May 2023 at 09:36, Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/22/2023 5:35 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 15:51, Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@quicinc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The IPQ9574 platform has 4 Gen3 PCIe controllers: two single-lane
> >> and two dual-lane based on SNPS core 5.70a
> >> The Qcom IP rev is 1.27.0 and Synopsys IP rev is 5.80a
> >> Added a new compatible 'qcom,pcie-ipq9574' and 'ops_1_27_0'
> >> which reuses all the members of 'ops_2_9_0' except for the post_init
> >> as the SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE configuration differs between 2_9_0
> >> and 1_27_0.
> >> Also, modified get_resources of 'ops 2_9_0' to get the clocks
> >> from the device tree and modelled the post init sequence as
> >> a common function to avoid code redundancy.
> >>
> >> Co-developed-by: Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@quicinc.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@quicinc.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@quicinc.com>
> >> ---
> >> Changes in V3:
> >> - Rebased on top of linux-next/master
> >>
> >> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++--------
> >> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> >> index 4ab30892f6ef..3682ecdead1f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> >> @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@
> >>
> >> /* PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE register value */
> >> #define SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ 0x10000000
> >> +#define SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ_1_27_0 0x08000000
> >>
> >> /* PARF_MHI_CLOCK_RESET_CTRL register fields */
> >> #define AHB_CLK_EN BIT(0)
> >> @@ -202,10 +203,10 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_7_0 {
> >> struct reset_control *rst;
> >> };
> >>
> >> -#define QCOM_PCIE_2_9_0_MAX_CLOCKS 5
> >> struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 {
> >> - struct clk_bulk_data clks[QCOM_PCIE_2_9_0_MAX_CLOCKS];
> >> + struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
> >> struct reset_control *rst;
> >> + int num_clks;
> >> };
> >>
> >> union qcom_pcie_resources {
> >> @@ -1050,17 +1051,10 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >> struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 *res = &pcie->res.v2_9_0;
> >> struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> >> struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> >> - int ret;
> >>
> >> - res->clks[0].id = "iface";
> >> - res->clks[1].id = "axi_m";
> >> - res->clks[2].id = "axi_s";
> >> - res->clks[3].id = "axi_bridge";
> >> - res->clks[4].id = "rchng";
> >> -
> >> - ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(res->clks), res->clks);
> >> - if (ret < 0)
> >> - return ret;
> >> + res->num_clks = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(dev, &res->clks);
> >> + if (res->clks < 0)
> >> + return res->num_clks;
> >>
> >> res->rst = devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive(dev);
> >> if (IS_ERR(res->rst))
> >> @@ -1073,7 +1067,7 @@ static void qcom_pcie_deinit_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >> {
> >> struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 *res = &pcie->res.v2_9_0;
> >>
> >> - clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(res->clks), res->clks);
> >> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(res->num_clks, res->clks);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static int qcom_pcie_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >> @@ -1102,19 +1096,16 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >>
> >> usleep_range(2000, 2500);
> >>
> >> - return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(res->clks), res->clks);
> >> + return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(res->num_clks, res->clks);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >> +static int qcom_pcie_post_init(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >> {
> >> struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> >> u16 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> >> u32 val;
> >> int i;
> >>
> >> - writel(SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ,
> >> - pcie->parf + PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE);
> >> -
> >> val = readl(pcie->parf + PARF_PHY_CTRL);
> >> val &= ~PHY_TEST_PWR_DOWN;
> >> writel(val, pcie->parf + PARF_PHY_CTRL);
> >> @@ -1151,6 +1142,26 @@ static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static int qcom_pcie_post_init_1_27_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >> +{
> >> + writel(SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ_1_27_0,
> >> + pcie->parf + PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE);
> >> +
> >> + qcom_pcie_post_init(pcie);
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >> +{
> >> + writel(SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ,
> >> + pcie->parf + PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE);
> >> +
> >> + qcom_pcie_post_init(pcie);
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >
> > I'm not sure about moving the SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE initialization from
> > init() to post_init(). Probably a better solution might be to have two
> > init() callbacks and to call the common function from both of them.
> >
> Hi Dmitry, Originally, the SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE initialization was done
> part of post_init() callback only and we haven't moved it from init() to
> post_init().We have just added two post_init() callbacks to
> handle the SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE initialization accordingly for 1_27_0 and
> 2_9_0.

Ack, I see then.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

--
With best wishes
Dmitry