From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <acme@redhat.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@meta.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] perf: separate bpf_counter_list and bpf_filters
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 16:57:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230519235757.3613719-1-song@kernel.org> (raw)
evsel uses a union for the two lists. This turned out to be error prone.
For example:
[root@quaco ~]# perf stat --bpf-prog 5246
Error: cpu-clock event does not have sample flags 66c660
failed to set filter "(null)" on event cpu-clock with 2 (No such file or
directory)
Fix this issue by separating the two lists.
Fixes: 56ec9457a4a2 ("perf bpf filter: Implement event sample filtering")
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 1 +
tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 6 ++----
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index 2f5910b31fa9..c2dbb5647e75 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ void evsel__init(struct evsel *evsel,
evsel->bpf_fd = -1;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&evsel->config_terms);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&evsel->bpf_counter_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&evsel->bpf_filters);
perf_evsel__object.init(evsel);
evsel->sample_size = __evsel__sample_size(attr->sample_type);
evsel__calc_id_pos(evsel);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
index df8928745fc6..0f54f28a69c2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
@@ -151,10 +151,8 @@ struct evsel {
*/
struct bpf_counter_ops *bpf_counter_ops;
- union {
- struct list_head bpf_counter_list; /* for perf-stat -b */
- struct list_head bpf_filters; /* for perf-record --filter */
- };
+ struct list_head bpf_counter_list; /* for perf-stat -b */
+ struct list_head bpf_filters; /* for perf-record --filter */
/* for perf-stat --use-bpf */
int bperf_leader_prog_fd;
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-05-20 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-19 23:57 Song Liu [this message]
2023-05-26 19:03 ` [PATCH] perf: separate bpf_counter_list and bpf_filters Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230519235757.3613719-1-song@kernel.org \
--to=song@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox