public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/alternatives: Add cond_resched() to text_poke_bp_batch()
Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 23:21:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230528232132.14ab3201@rorschach.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230529115246.a61734ce4e6d7644e2faec72@kernel.org>

On Mon, 29 May 2023 11:52:46 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> > +	/*
> > +	 * Function tracing can enable thousands of places that need to be
> > +	 * updated. This can take quite some time, and with full kernel debugging
> > +	 * enabled, this could cause the softlockup watchdog to trigger.
> > +	 * Add cond_resched() calls to each phase.
> > +	 */
> > +	cond_resched();  
> 
> Hmm, why don't you put this between the first step (put int3) and the
> second step (put other bytes)? I guess those would takes more time.

Ah you're right. I still want this here to clear the 'need resched'
flag before we start the process, but I did miss one after the first
loop.

Thanks for the review!

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-29  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-28 12:46 [PATCH] x86/alternatives: Add cond_resched() to text_poke_bp_batch() Steven Rostedt
2023-05-29  2:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-05-29  3:21   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2023-05-30 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-30 12:35   ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-31  9:08   ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230528232132.14ab3201@rorschach.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox