* [PATCH -next] btrfs: remove unused definition
@ 2023-05-30 9:34 Yang Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Yang Li @ 2023-05-30 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: clm; +Cc: josef, dsterba, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel, Yang Li, Abaci Robot
The code using variable pages_processed has been removed,
and function folio_nr_pages has not changed the memory of pointer folio,
so both should be removed.
silence the warning:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:230:16: warning: variable 'pages_processed' set but not used
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5340
Fixes: 8294b1869688 ("btrfs: split page locking out of __process_pages_contig")
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 89e093ae1c33..6919409c1183 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -227,7 +227,6 @@ static void __process_pages_contig(struct address_space *mapping,
pgoff_t start_index = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
pgoff_t end_index = end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
pgoff_t index = start_index;
- unsigned long pages_processed = 0;
struct folio_batch fbatch;
int i;
@@ -242,7 +241,6 @@ static void __process_pages_contig(struct address_space *mapping,
process_one_page(fs_info, &folio->page, locked_page,
page_ops, start, end);
- pages_processed += folio_nr_pages(folio);
}
folio_batch_release(&fbatch);
cond_resched();
--
2.20.1.7.g153144c
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-05-30 9:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-30 9:34 [PATCH -next] btrfs: remove unused definition Yang Li
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox